In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example,

The professor completely refutes the reading. She questions all of the three theories about how to solve the declining frogs populations.

First of all, she argues that reducing the uses of pesticides for farmer is not ecomical practical. Many farmes rely on pesticides to prevent losing huge number of crops. Moreover, there will be disadvantage because other competitors who lives far from the frog habitat do not have to follow the policy. So they will yield more.

Second, the theory about giving anti fungus medication and treatment to frogs is difficult to be implemented. The frogs should be catch first and applied one by one. Also, the frog will not generate the medication to its offspring so the new frogs have to retreatment again.

Third, although it is a good idea to protect water habitats from the excessive uses of humas, the main problem that destruct the frogs habitat is because global warming. Such climate change have contributed to disappear of many wetlands. So it makes the protection of water habitas is unlikely

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tely refutes the reading. She questions all of the three theories about how to solve the d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...mas, the main problem that destruct the frogs habitat is because global warming. Such...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, third, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 1373.03311258 64% => OK
No of words: 173.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05780346821 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63587617861 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64161849711 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0199379235 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.9166666667 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4166666667 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190950395782 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060305294504 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475581275683 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104810530985 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191101002796 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.