Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways, or on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons to develop your essay.
Any government has a myriad of problems to solve to contribute to the development of the country they have manage. This way, the government has to elaborate different programs to protect the environment and to maintain the economy. In my view, the financing of the improvement of public transportation can contribute to the enhancing of these two pivotal spheres of life. I hold this opinion for a few reasons.
First of all, the improvement of the public transportation will decrease expenses of the citizens and therefore, increase their quality of life. For example, as a dweller of a small country community, I know, that sometimes people, who live in rural areas, have problems to commute to work or to a school. The public transportation simply lacks in such remote locations, and hence, the people have to have their own vehicles, which are quite expensive. It especially affects the teenagers. To be clear, the teenagers have to start working while still being students to purchase a car. On the other hand, if the young people have a public transportation available, they can save their money and contribute it to their education and excel in life. To that end, the investment of the government into the development of the public transportation in the countryside will help young people to build the successful future.
Secondly, with the enhancing of the public transportation, the government can improve the environmental situation in the world. It is not a secret, that the enormous amount of private vehicles on the roads causes the global warming worldwide, which in turn, harms our planet. A myriad of species today is at risk of disappearing because of the climate change. When people have buses or subway in easy availability, especially in the big cities, they very often tend to decrease the use of their own cars in order to avoid traffic problems and save the priceless time. Therefore, the amount of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which is the major cause of the global warming, could be reduced. As you see, by the amelioration of the public transportation, the government has a chance to protect our planet from declining.
To conclude, I strongly believe that the government should spend more money on improving public transportation. This is because it will contribute to the economic satisfaction of the citizens and will help our planet thrive.
- Some people prefer to spend most of their time alone. Others like to be with friends most of the time. Do you prefer to spend your time alone or with friends? Use specific reasons to support your answer. 70
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 80
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways, or on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons to develop your essay. 68
- Some people prefer to live in the countryside or in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 63
- What is a very important skill a person should learn in order to be successful in the world today Choose one skill and use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'managed'.
Suggestion: managed
...he development of the country they have manage. This way, the government has to elabor...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tizens and will help our planet thrive.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, first of all, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 30.3222958057 211% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 24.0 5.01324503311 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1373.03311258 145% => OK
No of words: 395.0 270.72406181 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03291139241 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03101100623 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491139240506 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 624.6 419.366225166 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 2.0 0.116997792494 1709% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6368962978 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.631578947 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214619701437 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651362259745 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827261349962 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140021963759 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383397044575 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.