The solution to the problems about mars mission
Recently, there has been a ton of debates as to the mars mission. Most specifically, in regarding to reading, the writer puts forth the idea that there are arrays of problems with this plan. In the listening, the lecturer is quick to point out there are serious flaws with the writer's claim. In fact, the professor believes this mission is challengeable but there are several solutions to these problems, and addresses, in detail, the trouble with each point in the reading test.
First and foremost, the author in the article states that the mars mission is too long a trip and space vehicles is limited to put on enough food, water and oxygen. Some professionals, in the same field, however, stand in firm opposition.
In the listening, for example, the lecturer states travellers can use Hidropanic plants because this kind of plant can produce oxygen and food. He goes on to say that with cultivate them the astronauts can clean water and have fresh air and water.
One group of scholars represented by the writer think that astronauts on the mars mission spending a long time in zero gravity and these phenomena have negative effects on the human body. Of course, though, not all the experts believe this claim is accurate.
Finally, the writer wraps his argument by positing that the astronauts would be exposed dengerous level of space radiation. In the listening, the speaker takes issue by contending that intensity of space radiation is not always stable and astronauts can put shields
during a dangerous time.
To sum up, both the lecturer and writer hold conflicting views about the mars mission.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-01 | Harshitha2623 | 85 | view |
| 2021-01-16 | Elhamsarvari | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | Mao Zheyuan | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | toshaklg | 95 | view |
| 2015-05-25 | unknownpleasures | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, regarding, so, as to, for example, in fact, kind of, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97794117647 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57470561357 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580882352941 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2239731116 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.153846154 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21818283944 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070284719428 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889961786786 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929773225693 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959864573056 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.