Soon technology will provide smart cars that virtually drives themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and other technologies that w
The reading and the conversation both discusses about the induction of smart cars in our society. The passage supports the idea of introducing self driving cars while the person in the conversation disagrees with the article. She presents three opposing reasons to make her point.
Firstly, the article mentions about the advantages of smart automobiles by stating that there introduction would reduce the occurence of accidents significantly. In the support of it passage mentions that accurate sensors incorporated in the car will help preventing accidents. The person in the conversations rebuts against this claim by stating that the powerful or smart devices are bound to make mistakes. And then further elaborates by stating the accidents will be of higher magnitude as the cars are suppossed to move together.
Secondly, the reading presents that the current traffic problems will be diminshed by the use of smart vehicles. The reading explains its solutions by stating that smart cars will be running at very high spped thus reducing the congestion in the town. The speaker roots against this claim by saying that the higher speed will result in more comfortable journey as a result more and more people will start driving their cars this will cause further congestion of roads and ultimately negate the effect of driving at increased speeds.
Finally, The reading contends that cost of driving smart cars is quite lower compared to its counterpart. the article suggest that overall cost of maintaining the car that is the cost which are incurred because of fault in breaks and tire repairs will be mitigated. The lecturer disagrees with it asserting that the other cost of accommodating sensors will be very high and this will result in no reduction in the prices of the car.
The above mentioned claims and then disapproving arguments are presented in the reading and listening.
- Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning." 66
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning." 33
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The following appeared in a memo from New Ventures Consulting to the president of HobCo, Inc., a chain of hobby shops."Our team has completed its research on suitable building sites for a new HobCo hobby Shop in the city of Grilldon. We discovered th 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to prevent' or 'prevent'.
Suggestion: to prevent; prevent
...nsors incorporated in the car will help preventing accidents. The person in the conversati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...uite lower compared to its counterpart. the article suggest that overall cost of ma...
^^^
Line 13, column 119, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...ompared to its counterpart. the article suggest that overall cost of maintaining the ca...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21824104235 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72697778013 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495114006515 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5300877431 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198104464914 0.272083759551 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726642251577 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433796142912 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104453989486 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563734132151 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.