Summarise the point made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubts on specific points made int the reading passage.
According to the reading passage, three reasons mentioned to approve that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline, while in the listening section, lecturer argued that those reasons are not convincing, and he stated other competing theories to contradict the information in the passage.
In the reading passage, at first, author claimed that the increased use of ethanol fuel would not help to solve global warming, which is one of the biggest environmental problems, because ethanol also release carbon dioxide. Second, production of significant amounts of ethanol would reduce the amounts of plants that feed farm animals. Finally, ethanol fuel will never be able to compete with gasoline on price, because United States government help in the form of tax subsides to ethanol producers.
However, in the lecture, speaker pointed out that although ethanol fuel is a good alternative, but reasons, which mentioned in the passage, are not convincing. Also he stated three controversial theories. First, ethanol fuel will not add to global warming, because it is made by plants. In other words, because growing plants absorb carbon dioxide, it removes carbon dioxide from atmosphere. Second, scientist using cellulose to provide ethanol fuel from plants, which parts of plants that are not eaten by farm animals, so it does not reduce the food of animal. Finally, ethanol fuel will compete with gasoline on price, because if amounts of providing ethanol by producers increase, ethanol's price will drop as more of it become available, and it's price drops about forty percent.
- TPO 49 integrated writing skill 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 37 integrated writing skill 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement to improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- TPO 33 integrated writing skill 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d other competing theories to contradict the information in the passage. In the ...
^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ned in the passage, are not convincing. Also he stated three controversial theories....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30278884462 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61876967976 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549800796813 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.260718492 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.1 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.046749598045 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221756574004 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266955635233 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0343532164554 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00729572476361 0.0443174109184 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.