Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubts on specific points made in the reading passage.
According to the reading passage, three possible causes were mentioned to suggest the reasons for Little Ice Age that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900 CE, while in the listening section, lecturer claimed that passage's arguments are out of date, and he stated some competing theories.
In the passage, author pointed out three theories. First, the cooling may have been caused by disrupting of ocean currents. Second, volcanic eruptions could have cause the little ice age. Finally, substantial decrease in human populations may have contributed indirectly to the cooling of the climate.
However, in the listening section, speaker suggested some controversial ideas that contradicted to passage's information. First, passage argued that Gulf stream disruption could have caused the little ice age, while lecturer claimed that Gulf stream was in the Europe, and it affected only some particular countries, although little ice age was contributed to the whole world, such as New Zealand. Second, volcanoes produce visual effects such as colorful sunset, which there was no reports about that in the passage, so idea of volcanic eruption was not strong enough. Finally, forest trees and agricultural growth had not enough time to work on cooling the climate, because forest trees were cut down immediately and there were not long enough to cool the climate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'passage'.
Suggestion: passage
...ontroversial ideas that contradicted to passages information. First, passage argued that...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, second, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35348837209 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58248876905 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595348837209 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.6902854195 49.2860985944 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.888888889 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.055352013467 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025699376029 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340184458584 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417268840273 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131185370087 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.