summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the points that several methods of protecting the forests from being infected by the P. ramorum mentioned in the reading passage
In the reading passage, the author discusses several methods of protecting the forests from being infected by the P. ramorum have been proposed, while the lecture claims that what the passage state is not convincing and disputes those ideas presented in the passage with several proofs.
Firstly, according to the passage, it is suggested that many P. ramorum spores can be found along hiking or biking trails, indicating human-assisted spread by way of shoes and bicycle tires. In this case,people should encourage hikers to wash their shoes and install new bike scrubbers on bicycle trails. In contrast, the professor argues in the lecture that the virus would not spread only from human. There are other ways that could accelerate the speed, such as rain or water stream which flow through a long distance. Threfore, it is hard to control the diffusion of the P. ramorum.
In addition, the statment in the reading material indicates that a few fungicidal chemicals could be used to stimulate the oak trees' natural defense against the P. ramorum. On the country, the professor points out that this method has only short effectiveness after direct injection. Moreover, this way is not practical since it is not useful for the entire forest. What have remember is that it is equally expensive.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that the way of clear-cutting, which means that cutting and burning the diseased oaks aling with the semmingly healthy vegetation surrounding the oaks. However, the speaker argues that this approach would destroy some non-infection vegetation and trees. Some of these species are pretty treasured in the forest. Clear-cutting means a great ecological damage than the funhus itself.
- There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual wo 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- summarize the points in the passage being sure to explain the deline of the yellow cedar described in the reading passage 73
- Government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- A person should never make an important alone 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the forests from being infected by the P. ramorum have been proposed, while the...
^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , people
...of shoes and bicycle tires. In this case,people should encourage hikers to wash their s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'remembered'.
Suggestion: remembered
...useful for the entire forest. What have remember is that it is equally expensive. Final...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great ecological damage'.
Suggestion: great ecological damage
...ured in the forest. Clear-cutting means a great ecological damage than the funhus itself.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19424460432 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66182189339 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4445695327 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230481985739 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059327966618 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908731571979 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142155560967 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108383474588 0.0443174109184 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the forests from being infected by the P. ramorum have been proposed, while the...
^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , people
...of shoes and bicycle tires. In this case,people should encourage hikers to wash their s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'remembered'.
Suggestion: remembered
...useful for the entire forest. What have remember is that it is equally expensive. Final...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great ecological damage'.
Suggestion: great ecological damage
...ured in the forest. Clear-cutting means a great ecological damage than the funhus itself.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19424460432 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66182189339 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4445695327 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230481985739 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059327966618 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908731571979 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142155560967 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108383474588 0.0443174109184 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.