Summarize the reading and listening passage.
The reading and listening passage both discuss the truthfulness of Chevalier de Seingalt's memoir.
First, the reading passage states that Chevalier made up numerous instances in his memoir. The passage supports this by stating an example of how Chevalier once asked for a huge amount of money from a merchant in Switzerland. They conclude by this action that if a person is wealthy, he need not take money from someone else. In the listening passage, the lecturer contradicts this point by stating a fact about how in Switzerland it takes some time to get money once you sell your assets. The lecturer states that this doesn't by anyway prove that Chevalier was poor.
Second, the reading passage discusses the validity of the conversations mentioned in the memoir by saying that no individual has a memory of gathering exact details of a talk. However, the lecturer dismisses this point by bringing up Chevalier's notes which he wrote every night for several years. He further strengthens his point by speaking about the witnesses who saw Chevalier use his notes while writing the memoir.
Third, the reading passage discusses how the critics were not satisfied with Chevalier's escape as they thought that his close acquaintances had connections that could've made Chevalier's freeing from the jail a success. The listening passage contradicts by mentioning how the other jailers had greater connections but still were serving their time in prison. The lecturer further pints out about the seal which had to be repaired after Chevalier's escape which proves that the actual event actually occured and was not made up.
To sum up, this is how the listening passage opposes the points made in the reading text.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r assets. The lecturer states that this doesnt by anyway prove that Chevalier was poor...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, anyway, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, then, third, while, speaking about, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11743772242 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61408672855 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537366548043 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6481567208 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.615384615 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22499353357 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104933460544 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111271667061 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193230144823 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104764142745 0.0443174109184 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.