test 1
The reading passage provides three arguments to prove that R. robustus, which is ancient mammal, could not be hunters. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She gives a counterargument for each statement made in the reading.
Firstly, although r. robustus was small enough to eat the psittacosaurs, as the reading states, the lecturer says that it could hunt for its babies. According to the findings that the lecturer mentions, psittacosaurs’ baby found in the r. robustus’s stomach was twice smaller than its predator.
Secondly, even though r. robustus’s legs were short and side-positioned, these mammals still could be hunters. To prove this statement the lecturer reminds that the Tasmanian Devil, which is modern mammal with the same legs as r.robustus, is an active hunter and develops a speed of up to 15 km/h.
Lastly, the reading passages suggests that no teeth marks left on the bones found in the r. robustus stomach, prove they ate psittacosaurs’ eggs. However, the reason there was no teeth marks, according to the lecturer, could be the fact that their backteeth were not supposed for chewing. Therefore, they could swallow the whole prey or eat it in big parts.
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 90
- test 1 3
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 70
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 90
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 197.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16751269036 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92474782 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609137055838 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7262084544 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.8666666667 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1333333333 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.