Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Some people approve media companies to produce advertising for children. In my opinion, TV adverting should not be aimed at young children as they do not understand the meaning yet, it can impact on their relations with family, and watching ads may worsen their health.
Firstly, children at that age are too small to understand whether it is advertising or not. They see the picture and they immediately want it, no matter how good or bad a product really is. They cannot compare products within the category, so young kids just rely on advertising and ask their parents to buy exactly that thing they saw on ad. Since I have a 4-year brother, who sometimes see advertisements during TV programs for kids, I know on my own experience that he does not understand the quality of the advertised product.
Secondly, watching TV ads by young children can have influence on their relationship with parents in different ways but mostly negative one. As I mentioned before, after young children see beautiful and colorful toys on TV, they would most likely want to buy it. Although some parents can afford to buy new toys every time a kid asks and, thus, improve their relations with children, most of the parents cannot afford such expenses. It is also should be considered that advertised things cost higher, as companies have to invest more money for promotion. When parents do not buy toys, children get upset and could even tell parents they do not love them at all.
Lastly, young children should be restricted from watching TV and particularly TV ads because it can affect their health. It was proved long before that watching television may worsen one’s eyesight. Besides, ads are usually pretty colorful with fast movements in it. Such activity exhaust one’s eyes that eyesight will gradually decline.
In conclusion, I would like to tell that I support the opinion that children should not be exposed to TV adverting at young age for at least three reasons: they do not understand it yet, they can spoil their relations with parents, and it could be bad for their health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | Thomas2028 | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-24 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 90
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 70
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 90
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 70
- test 1 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'exhausts'.
Suggestion: exhausts
...ith fast movements in it. Such activity exhaust one’s eyes that eyesight will gradually...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, really, second, secondly, so, thus, at least, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89014084507 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56656666223 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538028169014 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4727953613 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203379811827 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755971869062 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543886164633 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132979827684 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020248684849 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.