In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
There are a lot of predictions have been made on how our life will look like in foreseeable future. One of the aspects concerns the usage of cars. Many people believe that new technologies will bring us new means of transports that will force people to abandon their ordinary ones. In my opinion, the number of cars will be increasing in twenty years from now. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, the growing number of population will raise the demand for cars. In most developing countries people tend to start their own family at the very young age which boosts the reproduction cycle. In addition, they usually prefer to have three or more children per family. Since such nations also do not pay much attention to ecology issues, they will buy a car for their grown-up member without any doubts. For example, we can choose the country of China, which population makes one-seventh of the worlds one. According to the recent study carried out by China Government, for the last decade, the number of personal cars has an increase of approximately 250%. If the countries' population continue to grow in the same manner, the amount of cars will further raise.
Second, cars will be much cheaper in future. It is the matter of fact that when technologies, which some time ago regarded as new and were limited available, become widespread, it reduces their cost. As a result, in twenty years most of the cars will be cheap enough to be affordable by the majority of the population. I have to admit that my opinion on this subject has been profoundly influenced by my personal experience. Four years ago I bought a new car that cost me a fortune; I had worked hard to get that car to make my life less complicated. However, few years later a friend of mine chose this particular model of the car but the price had been already reduced. If the cars had not lost its price, she probably would not have bought it and there would been for one car less that is in use today.
In conclusion, even though innovations can probably replace cars in the near future, I still believe that it will not happen this soon. Moreover, the number of cars will even increase because Earth's population is still growing and cars are becoming cheaper. I hope that this issue will be further analyzed in terms of ecological impact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- test 1 3
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 90
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 70
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 70
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... member without any doubts. For example, we can choose the country of China, whic...
^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... increase of approximately 250%. If the countries population continue to grow in the same...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e. Second, cars will be much cheaper in future. It is the matter of fact that when tec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 763, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
...ould not have bought it and there would been for one car less that is in use today. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, for example, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65238095238 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50074365357 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1717192853 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8181818182 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40909090909 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322184880314 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973929450009 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100237234933 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199878387871 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776778256278 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.