The reading and the lecture are both about diminishing workdays for employees. Whereas the author of the reading states that, four-day work will increase company's profit, the lecture suggest that working four days a week can't be beneficial for financial income.
First of all, according to the reading, reducing workday can save more money because of the employees who is rested and do their job more efficiently. Moreover, author suggests that hiring new workers won't make additional payment. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says more employees require more money. Because company need to buy a new computer and prepare office.
Secondly, the reading states that working few days can raise more working place. So that, it can diminish the unemployment. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. He argues that employer would not add accessible job due to the fact that, they hope that, workers will choose to work five-day week.
Finally, the reading claims that, four-day work is good way to cultivate to mind or skill development. On the other hand, the lecturer believe that employees will lose their job or can't promote because employer will support five-day week worker.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about new system of working days, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecture.
- TPO-50 3
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 54. The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is being repla 86
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 85
- Do you agree or disagree? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e suggest that working four days a week cant be beneficial for financial income. Fi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e that employees will lose their job or cant promote because employer will support f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23423423423 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52311769041 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0487054896 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300504637268 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091505881756 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708798829335 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15704674045 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691247035873 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.