TPO 07 integrated
wood companies do not like ecological certifications for three reasons:
1, people do not distinguish their advertisements
2, they are more expensive than regular woods
3, this business is not competitive
The article claims that wood firms in the United States cannot adopt their products to the eco-frindly criteria even though other organizations and industries are benefiting from its related certifications, and the author provides three main rationalizations to support hthis idea. Conversely, the professor completely opposes the reading's hypotheses as he claims that all of them are not necessarily positive. In the following, the elaborations of the lecturer will be discussed thoroughly.
First of all, the reading states that the native customers of USA are used to watching diverse advertisements; therefore, they usually do not care to the certified eco-woods. On the other hand, the professor disputes this opinion insomuch as he believes that these consumers never treat all advertisements teh same; moreover they have the ability to distinguish between a typical product and an eco-friendly one. Furthermore, they refer to the independent consumer agencies' notes and suggestions who may also have international reputation.
Secondly, the passage upholds that people are not attracted to eco-woods since these wooden tools are more expensive than regular ones. In contrast, the lecturer asserts that this explanation is just true when two elements are only compared through the lens of their prices due to the researchers' findings, but this presumption is rejected when the difference between the prices are not relatively noticable. Owing to the prices of these state-of-the-art woods are merely 5% higher that normal woods, individuals will accept them; besides they are eager to use them inasmuch as they presume that this action will protect their environment.
Third, the reading claims that this innovation in wood industry is not profitable for companies. Nonetheless, the professor rejects this idea as a result of the fact that he thinks if native companies do not act thoughtfully and fast, foreign companies will defeat them in the competition of atracting new domestic consumers. Therefore, the government must support these eco-freindly certifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 85 | view |
- TPO 20 integrated let it burn policy affects the parks in three ways first it damages the trees and vegetation in parks second it kills wildlife third it has a negative affect on the local economy 80
- TPO 15 independent agree or not in order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age 73
- in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 73
- in many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages 80
- TPO 16 Integrated the archaeology science is in danger in Britain because of three reasons many artifacts were lost in construction projects many professionals feel that financial support for their research is inadequate it is difficult to have a career i 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63492063492 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14559124301 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9204807795 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.916666667 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0833333333 7.06452816374 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256758442139 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830170847408 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480343553736 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146765087264 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266338564142 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.3589403974 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.8541721854 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.42419426049 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 63.6247240618 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.