The probable reasons of the northwestern North America yellow cedar declining are discussed in the reading passage and the professor contradict with each of hypothesis as following:
First, the cedar bark beetle introduce as the peasts for the yeloow cedar trees because, scientists have observed that beetles attack to the yellow cedars and cause them to die. But, the professor disaproves this hypothesis because he declares that the cedar trees have possioness chemicals which can kill the beetles as well.
According to the reading passage, bears can harm the yellow cedars by clawin the body of the tree in order to reach the sweet nucle of them, however the professor give an example about yellow cedars in the North America islands which their population has decline without the presence of bears. So it's not a good idea to suspect the bears as yellow cedars predators.
Finally the reading pasage acknowlege that the climate changing has the suffering effects on the yellow cedars during the hundred years. The cedar trees grow their roots late in the winter and the cold winter climate can freez their surface roots but the professor don't agree with this statement. He talk about trees in the high and low elevations which they have not suffered by the climate variations.
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 73
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 70
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 73
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...he bears as yellow cedars predators. Finally the reading pasage acknowlege that the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...z their surface roots but the professor dont agree with this statement. He talk abou...
^^^^
Line 6, column 301, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'talks'.
Suggestion: talks
...ssor dont agree with this statement. He talk about trees in the high and low elevati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05164319249 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37256948049 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553990610329 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.0293454453 49.2860985944 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.714285714 110.228320801 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 21.698381199 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466792357347 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214712296778 0.0996497079465 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657561522132 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273543317209 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816528186785 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.