According to the reading passage, the frog species suffer from many environmental problems which they lead to the huge declining in the frog population. The author mentions three potential ways to cease the population declining. However, the professor opposes all of them.
First of all, the author implies that pesticides which are the chemicals used to kill harmful insects are one of the most threatening factors for the frog population. Although pesticides are used by farmers to protect their crops, they can hurt frog species severely. The professor states that the prohibition of pesticides cannot work well on account of the farmers' success in the agriculture and selling their crops has a strong relation to pesticides. These chemicals help the crops to stay competitive in the market. Hence, the restriction of pesticides is not practical for farmers.
Second, the author indicates that the fungus is one of the greatest dangerous factors causes death to frog species. According to the passage, with some treatments such as antifungal medication, we can protect frogs from fungus in large scale. The professor refutes the mentioned statement, she explains that the treatments should implement on the individuals and consequently, protection of all frog species needs an impossible attempt. Therefore, based on the professor statements, these treatments cannot be practical in large scales.
Finally, the author argues that many of the frog species suffer from the habitat threatening and the people who live near the frog habitats should reduce their water consumption. Even though the professor confirms that the wetlands and other frog habitats were destructed, instead she states that the real reason for such a massive destruction is global warming. She implies that the huge limiting regularizations cannot be practical and it is unlikely all the people approve of them.
In brief, the professor and the author give contradicting ideas about the present methods for frog saving. The professor clarifies the problems associated with the above-mentioned methods and argues that all the methods are impractical and cannot be used in large scale.
- TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 78
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 76
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 76
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'farmers'' or 'farmer's'?
Suggestion: farmers'; farmer's
...ides cannot work well on account of the farmers success in the agriculture and selling ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, in brief, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43916913947 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85884370802 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492581602374 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3030486938 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.823529412 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429769144502 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133565932941 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1089050353 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242853103201 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593655849661 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.