tpo 31
The reading claims that the special pattern surrounding the Sinosauropteryx should not interpret as the feather. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some reasons to refute them all.
First, the author argues that this feather like pattern probably created because of the decomposing of the Sinosauropteryx`s skin. Conversely, the lecturer casts doubts on this idea by stating that the decomposition process for creating such structure do not observed in the other location of this volcanic site. Moreover, she states that the well condition of other fossils in this site can clearly depict that these feather like structures belongs to the Sinosauroptery and have not created after its death.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that if these structures belonged to this kind of dinosaurs, it could be another part of this animal such as its frills. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that the chemical compositions of feather are far different with the chemical compositions of frills. Feathers contain special proteins which scientists have recorded them in these feather like structures, so, they were definitely dinosaur’s feathers.
Finally, the reading asserts that these feather like structures locations clearly illuminates that they could not perform any of the important functions of feathers do such as cooling the animal’s body or help it to fly. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that feathers could be used for other important functions. For example, they could be utilized for attracting female animals. She, argues that the new researches show that these fathers was colorful, so, these were probably used for display behavior by this kind of dinosaurs.
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'such as', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251592356688 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.140127388535 0.158904122519 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0668789808917 0.0723426182421 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0541401273885 0.0435111971325 124% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0350318471338 0.0277247811725 126% => OK
Prepositions: 0.149681528662 0.128828473217 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0350318471338 0.0370669169778 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9781440779 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.015923566879 0.0208969081088 76% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.143312101911 0.128158765124 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0191082802548 0.0158828679856 120% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0031847133758 0.0114777025283 28% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1770.0 1645.83664459 108% => OK
No of words: 275.0 271.125827815 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.43636363636 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.403636363636 0.374372842146 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.356363636364 0.287516216867 124% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.232727272727 0.187439937562 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145454545455 0.113142543107 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9781440779 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 55.9721149163 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9166666667 21.7502111507 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1452514789 49.3711431718 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 132.220823453 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 21.7502111507 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 0.878197800319 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 58.553030303 50.5018328374 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.90277777778 1.90840788429 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.663228169488 0.549887131256 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.151645337864 0.142949733639 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0655481317561 0.0787303798458 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.626325190791 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138809020008 0.139662658121 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.327637615203 0.266732575781 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142847738632 0.103435571967 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.448830100233 0.414875509568 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0348339271219 0.0530846634433 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.501276800594 0.40443939384 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043603219179 0.0528353158467 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.49668874172 200% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.