TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see
Based on given materials, the article as well as the lecture discusses main causes of a huge marine mammal know as Steller's sea cow extinction. The author states three theories that could be responsible of extinction. That being said, the lecturer provides several ideas to repudiate these theories.
Initially, the author says that the sea cows might have been overhunted by groups of native Siberian people. However, the lecturer explains that they were massive creatures which had nine meters length. In addition, a couple of them were adequate for native Siberian to provide food sources for months. Thus, it could not be a reasonable theories for extinction.
Second, the writer proclaims that ecosystems disturbances that caused a decline in their main source of food. Yet againn, the speaker underscores this assumption. He thinks, if this theory had happened, it would have affected other marines such as whales. Based on that there was not a serious decline in population of other marines, the theory seems incorrect.
The final point of contention between reading and listening passages is the possibility of extinction by European fur traders. The author thinks European fur traders who came to the island after 1741 could be main reason of extinction. On the other hand, the speaker explains that sea cows extincted soon after when European have arrived. Beside of that, when the European arrived to Bering Island, the population of Steller's sea cow was already quite small. Because of these reasons, European fur traders were not tangible causes of sea cows' extinction.
- Do yo agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 60
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- TPO 44 - Integrated Writing Task 81
- TPO 32 85
- tpo 49 the humpbacks whales 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'theory'?
Suggestion: theory
...ths. Thus, it could not be a reasonable theories for extinction. Second, the writer p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, thus, well, as to, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2431372549 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60331318194 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58431372549 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7170090461 49.2860985944 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5625 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50604788597 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14692546547 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111580097004 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265917361333 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118901678123 0.0443174109184 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.