tpo-40
In the reading, the author claims that setting permanent stations on Venus is impossible by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the reasons questionable and implausible, the lecturer repudiates the claim and states the idea that if the stations are floated in the atmosphere of the Venus, nearly 15 kilometers above the surface, the arguments presented in the reading will not be in practice anymore.
At first, the author argues that atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is much greater than the pressure at the Earth's surface so that approximately all human will be crushed, should they land on the surface of the Venus. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that provided that stations floated above the surface, the pressure on them will not be too high. In that distant from the surface, the pressure is as much as Earth's surface pressure; thus, there is no danger of crushing.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that there is no available supply of water and oxygen on Venus' surface. That being said, the lectures clarifying the fact that although there are no reservoirs of water and oxygen, the carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid could be employed for producing water and oxygen. Making vital supply of water and oxygen by using existed components in Venus' atmosphere is easy. Consequently, human does not have to import water and oxygen from Earth.
Finally, the author draws attention to lack of sunlight on the planet surface and the corresponding prevention the use of solar power cells there to make electricity. Yet again, the lecturer dismisses it by pointing out that floated stations can get enough sunlight reflected back by the thick clouds placed below it. Moreover, some sunlight can pass through the clouds above it; thus, there would be so sunlights that produce more than needed electricity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Abbas.ghaffari | 81 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | M.S 2019 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Mamalhastam | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | aaaaaaaaaa | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | aaaaaaaaaa | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05211726384 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60397733063 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517915309446 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1027339295 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427871786696 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148016729573 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579941383599 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226536792434 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746885152035 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.