TPO 41

Essay topics:

TPO 41

The reading and the lecture discuss the disadvantages of creating new strict rules against coal ash. The passage claims that the downsides of this decision are more than its upsides. However, the speaker brings up three reasons to rebut all dubious ideas presented and asserts that all disadvantages have been exaggerated by power companies.
First of all, the writer holds the view that the effective environment regulations exist so there is no need for setting a new one. In contrast, the professor refutes this idea and underlines the fact that this rules only uses for new lands. In other words, he believes that this rules should be used for both new and old land to prevent leaking this material to ground which is harmful to human and environment health, if it reaches water.
Second of all, the author contends that setting new rules will reduce the tendency for using the recycled product. However, the lecturer contradicts this contention and stresses that the same experience for another material has shown the different result with the writer's idea. Indeed, there has been set stricter rules for storing and handling mercury which has not had any effect on the depositing and recycling it.
Finally, the passage states that this restriction causes an increment in electricity cost, since the power companies have to pay significant money for following new rules. On the contrary, the speaker rebuts this statements and asserts that this amount doesn’t have a significant effect on bills. In fact, this cost will be divided among all people, so the price enhance will increase only 1 percent which does not have a crucial aspect on general public satisfaction.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-19 sonyeoso 80 view
2022-10-26 fvtfff 80 view
2021-11-02 parisashrp 80 view
2021-09-03 9877 80 view
2021-08-27 smnhmi 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...has shown the different result with the writers idea. Indeed, there has been set strict...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...es. On the contrary, the speaker rebuts this statements and asserts that this amount...
^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...which does not have a crucial aspect on general public satisfaction.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'first of all', 'in other words', 'on the contrary']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255737704918 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.177049180328 0.158904122519 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0754098360656 0.0723426182421 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0327868852459 0.0435111971325 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0131147540984 0.0277247811725 47% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118032786885 0.128828473217 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0590163934426 0.0370669169778 159% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57474638471 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.016393442623 0.0208969081088 78% => OK
Particles: 0.00327868852459 0.00154638098197 212% => OK
Determiners: 0.150819672131 0.128158765124 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0131147540984 0.0158828679856 83% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00983606557377 0.0114777025283 86% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1683.0 1645.83664459 102% => OK
No of words: 276.0 271.125827815 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09782608696 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369565217391 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286231884058 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173913043478 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108695652174 0.113142543107 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57474638471 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.539623497131 113% => OK
Word variations: 66.4018241718 53.8517498576 123% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8797261073 49.3711431718 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 132.220823453 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 51.6231884058 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.94117647059 1.90840788429 102% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.537826403932 0.549887131256 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109337163743 0.142949733639 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0442057151177 0.0787303798458 56% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.621672712923 0.631733273073 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0462108561445 0.139662658121 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245782174695 0.266732575781 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815589333613 0.103435571967 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.372562196018 0.414875509568 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0344147300467 0.0530846634433 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368150281411 0.40443939384 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544702940836 0.0528353158467 103% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.