Tpo 43- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
-Say nothing.
Public speaking increases stress in most of the people. As we know, stress increases the possibility of making mistakes. If I attend a meeting and the meeting leader makes a mistake in delivering the speech, I will discuss it right away. I believe conferring about the fault in the meeting is the most appropriate time, since it provides advantages for the speaker and the listeners.
First, it reduces the chance of future mistakes. Indeed, a small mistake has the ability to make a huge trouble. If I correct the lecturer during his speech, I provide a chance for the other audiences to learn the correct content, so I prevent this small mistake to growth. To shed light on my point further, let’s assume a professor has made a mistake in the presenting a topic of the method of teaching course and the audiences are going to be future teachers and professors. If they learn something incorrect, they will use incorrect method for teaching. Accordingly, it has an effect on the educational system of the country. In addition, noticing the incorrect content enhances professor attention on his speech. As a matter of fact, the lack of attention could be the reason of the professor mistakes. Therefore, his concentration will increase by noticing the errors that he has made.
Second, it facilitates learning the process. In fact, bother storming and discussing a topic in class increases learning efficiency. The professor can use this situation to ask other students' opinions and lead to think about that specific topic deeper. Participation in discussion helps students to see the topic from varieties of viewpoints which gives him wider view about the content. Moreover, this feedback helps professor to become aware of the knowledge of his students and their attention to presented material in the classroom. This feedback can be used for improving further material that is going to present in class. Consequently, the future subject will be conferred in higher quality.
In conclusion, I believe that noticing lecturer's mistake during the class reduces the chance of future mistakes and increases learning efficiency.
- TPO 33-When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 60
- TPO 28-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 45Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 71
- tpo 48 70
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in fact', 'as a matter of fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25641025641 0.229887763892 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.179487179487 0.158761421928 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0512820512821 0.0866891130778 59% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0230769230769 0.046263068375 50% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0615384615385 0.0685040099705 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123076923077 0.118717715034 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0564102564103 0.0351676179071 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85336358727 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0282051282051 0.0309702414327 91% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.125641025641 0.0887237588012 142% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0179487179487 0.0209618222197 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00512820512821 0.0139019557991 37% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2135.0 2387.08602151 89% => OK
No of words: 347.0 408.028673835 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.15273775216 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48200974243 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.417867435159 0.338922669872 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.334293948127 0.251872472559 133% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.244956772334 0.174417080927 140% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155619596542 0.112833075102 138% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85336358727 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49855907781 0.524397521467 95% => OK
Word variations: 52.0264354993 59.2087087015 88% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.5238095238 20.5533526081 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2933283578 48.84282405 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 120.699889404 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5238095238 20.5533526081 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.644075263715 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 49.9532043365 45.7405998639 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.65048543689 1.45489161554 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.532228044736 0.300154397459 177% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122143761516 0.103427244359 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0792455239116 0.0752933317313 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.509588799797 0.497263757937 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.179171406573 0.151897553556 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211459251815 0.114077575197 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956214408572 0.0781384742642 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.41687629138 0.336927656856 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.071768158269 0.067059652881 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.387510464685 0.210909579961 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074036091359 0.0618886996521 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8870967742 42% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.86379928315 259% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.