tpo 47
The reading passage argues a theory which mentions to ability for fly of a sort of winged reptiles known as Pterosaur that were own huge size and weight and supports the argument base on three points. However, the professor clarifies his disagreement by explaining some reason for each mentioned points in the reading.
As a first reason, the professor argues the reading's first point which mentions that these kinds of animals categorize as cold blooded animals. The lecturer mentions that Pterosaur can be arrange in the warm blooded animals’ group which their features like high metabolism generates sufficient power to flight although cold blooded animal are lack of ability to produce enough energy due to low metabolism. So, inaccurate categorize the mentioned animal in the low metabolism animal aren’t convincing to reject the theory.
Secondly, the professor explains a special physical characteristic of these animals which makes flying feasible. However, the reading illustrates the heavy weight as a significant impediment to flight this group, with a bone in their body their high weight was docile in the flying due to lecturer’s mentioned point. Therefore, physical structure isn’t satisfying reason to repudiate this ability of these animals.
Thirdly, methods like jumping are mundane among birds that push to soar while Pterosaur’s fossilize depicts fragile legs and muscle that couldn’t maintain their weight to fly due to reading’s explanation. In contrast, base on the professor’s opinion using four legs can solve the problem. In the other words, the main differences between the birds and Pterosaur is the using of different part of body that birds’ hind lims are used but in the Pterosaur all four lims are useful to push.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage argues a theory whic...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ach mentioned points in the reading. As a first reason, the professor argues ...
^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rejecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: rejecting
...etabolism animal aren't convincing to reject the theory. Secondly, the profess...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apos;t convincing to reject the theory. Secondly, the professor explains a spe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...e. However, the reading illustrates the heavy weight as a significant impediment to flight t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udiate this ability of these animals. Thirdly, methods like jumping are mundan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, in contrast, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47841726619 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97854107761 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564748201439 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5352226931 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.454545455 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221410314641 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082144380259 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623885830914 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131685011509 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314697837642 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.