TV appearance for professors
This topic discusses whether being on television is beneficial to professors, universities, and the public or not. The passage holds that television appearances are of great benefit, for all three of them. on On the other hand, the lecture holds that being on TV doesn’t benefit anyone the opposite view.
First of all, appearing on TV doesn’t benefit professors because Professors who show up on television are more likely to be seen as an entertainer instead of an educator. Under such a concept As a result, it will be hard for that professor to get invitations to academic meetings and funding, which decreases the professor’s chance to do more research and share more research results.
Universities also don’t benefit from such appearances. Showing up on television means a lot of time will be spent on travel, rehearsal, and makeup. This takes up the professor’s time on campus, which leads to less communication with students and less time doing research. So the professor will make less contribution to the school.
To the public, it is not beneficial for professors to be on TV. Nobody would like to watch a professor explain serious things if there are other entertainment programs after meals. Not only that, but the audience of TV programs is also more willing to listen to some basic knowledge, which can be told by a reporter by just doing a little research work.
To sum up, professors being on TV is more likely to bring disadvantages to themselves, and the universities they work in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-27 | ayumiyazaki | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-13 | Shubham Patel | 75 | view |
| 2021-03-19 | fmichela | 80 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | Manjushree | 90 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | unknown135 | 90 | view |
- Archaeologists have been wondering about the function of the shafts in the Great Pyramid which was built for an ancient Egyptian king The passage believes that the shafts are used for ventilation for religious reasons and as the passageways for the king s 75
- Pterosaurs 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Younger school children ages five to ten should be required to study art and music in addition to math language science and history Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Are meerkat sentinels and altrustics human act truly selfless 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Younger school children ages five to ten should be required to study art and music in addition to math language science and history Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vision appearances are of great benefit, for all three of them. on On the other h...
^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
... great benefit, for all three of them. on On the other hand, the lecture holds th...
^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: on
... great benefit, for all three of them. on On the other hand, the lecture holds that ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that being on TV doesn’t benefit anyone the opposite view. First of all, appea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, as a result, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97637795276 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97826253713 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562992125984 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7902343533 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2307692308 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332506980449 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124709131832 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121867668245 0.0662205650399 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188613579857 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834545998446 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.