urban foresting
Urban foresting is an issue of concern and to protect it from exploitation author has given some suggestions to consider to protect the existing forest. The professor refutes all the suggestions because she thinks none will be beneficial.
To begin with, one suggestion given by the author is Legislation. The professor sees flaws in this suggestion and she further explained the reason for thinking in such a way. She explained that such a program was once made years ago but did not work. She further carried that these programs are complicated and include many languages and in this way, the enforcement of legislation never happened.
The second suggestion was support via public funds or private funds. The professor disagrees with this opinion and explained that this will lead to a great impact on people's life because this will lead to an increase in taxes. She stated that only a small amount of funds can be collected by a private fund and this will consume 80% of taxes from the public. She thinks in such a way because the new plan has not given any clarification.
Another suggestion includes a campaign. The professor agrees that this would be beneficial. It should be the one to implemented in first phase. However, she states that people should make the proper goal because earlier many vague goals were set.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Although technology has made communication easier there are still as many misunderstandings among people as there were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- urban foresting 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Dancing plays an important role in a culture Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- easter island population decline cause 80
- studying abroad share likes and dislikes as per experience 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider protecting'.
Suggestion: consider protecting
...on author has given some suggestions to consider to protect the existing forest. The professor refu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93777777778 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63861542443 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3586724888 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3571428571 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0714285714 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0757962109009 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257485089473 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928375692762 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682895292515 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118280934289 0.0443174109184 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.