The speaker disputes the author suggest solution to create a fund that protect forests from being demolished. The lecturer provide several reasons to cast doubt about the real benefits of this fund.
First, according to the author providing funds to encourage agriculture would prevent companies from demolishing forest because farmers would stay to plant their lands. However, the lecturer find this idea debatable. He asserts that indeed this may not protect forests because farmers are continuously looking to increase their yield production through the use of fertilizers and pesticides which is also harmful to the environment.
Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that providing funds to help people would reduce the destruction of forests. However, the lecturer argues that this may not help forest destruction. He asserts that the government is mostly the forest owners and not the people. Thus providing this fund would go not to the beneficiary, and as a result would not help to protect the forests.
Finally, the author claims the fund would protect forests because it may preserve the diversity of species living in this environment. However, the lecturer disputes this claim by stating that giving money would not protect diversity because farmers would be planting trees only which may not help in growing different type of agriculture.
- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?:“People communicate with each other less than in the pass because of the popularity of television”.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Make sure to use your own words. Do not 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A good leader should spend more time listening to other people's ideas than taking his or her own ideas. 73
- People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things, other people learn by reading about things, others learn by listening to people talk about things.Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your 70
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
...sts from being demolished. The lecturer provide several reasons to cast doubt about the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41203703704 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63307921236 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6805188931 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.272727273 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100016161625 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472576240539 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0214237080479 0.0662205650399 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702893855512 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015020788804 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.