The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.
"Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program have just canceled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to the program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should restore the time devoted to weather and local news to its former level."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The business manager of a television station made a shift in programs broadcasting over the past year; in a Late-night news program the time of broadcasting national news increased and less time were devoted to weather news and local news. Through several unsupported assumptions the manager believes that this change has led to decrease of the viewers of the television. Based on that, the manager believes that returning to the same program schedule, as it was before the change, would preclude losing of audiences. The argument lacks enough evidence to lead us to evaluate the argument. In order to buttress the conclusion the manager needs the following evidence.
First, the manager needs statistical evidence showing that the total number of the audience is in a decline. There is no trace of a firm evidence showing that there is a net decrease of the viewers. It is possible indeed that with the change many of the people who were used to watching late night local news were disappointed in watching it in that channel. In this case the audience retention would be affected. However, it is highly possible that the number of viewers was compensated by many others preferring national news and want to know what is going on the world.
Secondly, although the most complaints are concerned with the local news or weather news, the author needs to provide evidence about the contents of the complaints. The contents should be clear and be related to the shortening of the programs’ time. It is possible that complaints were raised because of a calumny propagated through this local news and not the shortening of the program’s time. It is also possible the local weather news was not precise in weather forecasts that people made complaints about it. If these are the case, people are not dissatisfied of the change and the whole conclusion becomes questionable.
Furthermore, the author needs evidence that the local businesses discontinued their advertisements during late night because of the pertaining change. The cancellation might involve other reasons. They might cancel it to put their advertisement in a different time of day not in the late night to attract more viewers during better time of the day
Finally, assuming that all evidence leads us to give credence to the manager’s conclusion, still the author needs evidence that returning to the previous schedule of broadcasting programs will bring back the viewers. It is possible that people become indifferent to both the local and national news. A rival channels might already absorb the audiences and so on.
In short, the argument lacks several vital evidences in order to be evaluated. After providing the enumerated evidences by the author, we can have a judgment about the author’s conclusion evenhandedly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-06 | mhayat29 | 55 | view |
2019-09-04 | benson zhang | 55 | view |
2019-08-05 | sea0215 | 77 | view |
2019-06-26 | madiha3 | 89 | view |
2019-06-22 | Mrunal47286 | 67 | view |
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. 90
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little. 83
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 63
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at BuckinghamCollege."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current t 80
- 2. Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized. 60
Comments
thanks for the
thanks for the considerations
My first argument is not ok. However, When I compare it to the first argument on the top list under the same title, I see that the user yjc1989 has used the same argument and got 5.5.
please help me on this paradox?
Sorry, we made a mistake for
Sorry, we made a mistake for yjc1989. Thank you to remind us.
Correct me if I'm wrong: We
Correct me if I'm wrong:
We are only informed that most complaints are for the given program. Yet we do not know the numbers of the complaints, which could be possibly insignificant. There might be far more _compliments_ on the change of program. This is where the author needs to evince that the losing of audience is really at stake.
can it be the first correct argument?
suggested: No statistic is
suggested:
No statistic is provided that compares the complaints before and after the change in news. There is a possibility that they have been already many complaints before and amount of complaints might drop after the alterment in the news. Moreover, the argument does not specify the content of the complaints. The topics the complaints cover might be a problem with content rather than duration.
argument 1 -- not OK. this is not a loophole.
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
argument 4 -- OK
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 457 350
No. of Characters: 2285 1500
No. of Different Words: 195 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.624 4.7
Average Word Length: 5 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.732 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 166 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 137 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 98 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.87 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.115 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.391 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.302 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.534 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.097 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5