In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
The issue that each person in dominance should step down after every five year in all profession, whether that is business, politics, education or government is a contentious one. While each side has strengths and weaknesses. But in my opinion, stepping down just after five years is too early to change, hence I completely disagree with the issue. Because any development policy takes time to come into existence and if that idea does not work than it creates dissatisfaction among the people. Moreover, changing supreme personals so often will never allow any policy to settle down because new authority will adopt new rule.
In every profession, dominant figures always make the plan that how the system should work. And they need time to figure out the problems, but if they are being changed so early then no policy would work. Because no time was given to them to turn their ideas into real existences. Just like if a party comes into power then enough time must be given so that they can give their ideas in reality because any development process takes time. Hence five years tenure is too short for any personal to act, that’s why I feel the supreme personals must not stepped down after five years.
Secondly, whenever a new personal will come he may like the policy of his ancestor, so he will change idea. But none of them got enough time to witness the impact, so this could be wastage of money and energy and national property. As for example, when an education minister will be appointed, he will adopt his own idea just for five years. And then another descendant will come an implement his thinking. So, policies are just changing, not enough time is given to any personals to judge whether that policy was decent. Hence no personal should be stepped down just after five years, they should exist for more period to observe the impact of ideas.
Thirdly, when the major policies of a nation is changing just after every five years, then it surely will create people dissatisfaction upon the system. Like, education expenditure was reduced by one education minister for his tenure but soon he is changed, the new minister raised the cost to maintain the expenditure of his new policy then it will create dispute among the people and people will loose his faith on the government. And that is not satisfactory for any nation. Hence, every personal should have more tenure than five years.
In contrary, some may argue whether novice are getting less chances. This is absolutely wrong. Because when the period is only five years then majority of the duration will spend in making the plan and merely any time observe the output and judge the policy of any supreme personal.
In conclusion, I completely disagree with the issue that any one in power should get down after a little period of five years. Because he hardly got any time to expose his ideas and more importantly the lament will be the sufferer of this fickle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 16 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 16 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | Isolus | 66 | view |
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years 67
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 70
- All college and university students would benefit from spending at least one semester studying in a foreign country 60
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ged so early then no policy would work. Because no time was given to them to turn their...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...use any development process takes time. Hence five years tenure is too short for any ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...o judge whether that policy was decent. Hence no personal should be stepped down just...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ispute among the people and people will loose his faith on the government. And that i...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 56, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...me may argue whether novice are getting less chances. This is absolutely wrong. Beca...
^^^^
Line 11, column 58, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...completely disagree with the issue that any one in power should get down after a little...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt will be the sufferer of this fickle.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'while', 'as for', 'for example', 'i feel', 'in conclusion', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.214669051878 0.238963963785 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.153846153846 0.154291517835 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0590339892665 0.0886310499679 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0715563506261 0.0506014161523 141% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0483005366726 0.0449626384858 107% => OK
Prepositions: 0.112701252236 0.123526278965 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0286225402504 0.0379742944744 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.37609603597 2.82910677849 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0232558139535 0.0316879551592 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0107334525939 0.0014075125626 763% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.109123434705 0.0950106342287 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0447227191413 0.0245489744465 182% => Try to use less modal verbs (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0125223613596 0.0157978311181 79% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2951.0 2899.98275862 102% => OK
No of words: 510.0 478.390804598 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7862745098 6.0591788892 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.65681771538 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31568627451 0.369966551584 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.205882352941 0.285172536893 72% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.139215686275 0.207245337619 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0862745098039 0.136322040163 63% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37609603597 2.82910677849 84% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 234.298850575 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445098039216 0.492565540709 90% => OK
Word variations: 51.0708023567 56.8184620615 90% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 21.1264367816 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.4 23.7468607788 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7766008758 62.0618507366 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.04 143.81877709 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 23.7468607788 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.68 0.728815259664 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.87931034483 123% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.71264367816 91% => OK
Readability: 40.9882352941 52.2641144681 78% => OK
Elegance: 1.30065359477 1.64547068916 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24934882492 0.39480681544 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0849103754641 0.11556216369 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0819806756458 0.0736162880345 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.454814242253 0.531340600358 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164539724928 0.15197228837 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892898151707 0.158818324754 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107158396031 0.0851127212816 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.376870461728 0.388921930462 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0240523795553 0.0677916285025 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172944577894 0.28015025965 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081261343028 0.0610219844235 133% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.8591954023 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.30459770115 207% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.96264367816 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.10632183908 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.93390804598 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.04597701149 98% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 15.0862068966 133% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 3.75 Out of 6