The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide
In today's hectic life, everybody has to be in rush so as to not to be left behind in contending for the "field of competition”, and they work more and more in order to achieve their goals. In this regard, traveling enjoys a pivotal role in relieving their tired spirits. With this in mind, some people believe that it stands to reason that it is better for one to travel in a group led by a tour guide, while others hold the opposite. I, personally, subscribe to the latter attitude for quite a few reasons, three of the most substantial of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
The most compelling reason is that while individuals travel without a tour, they have more freedom, which leads to enjoy more from their travel. It is crystal clear that different people have various interests and tastes, and as a result one may be interested in a place, while others do not. One may also want to spend more time in visiting one place in comparison with others. Moreover, travel without a tour gives an individual a chance to select his or her companions, whom they have similar interests in common, instead of tolerating those who might be boring, rude, and reckless.
Another interpretation as to why I do not concur with the first perspective in the introductory paragraph lies in the fact that one can reach the benefit of scheduling travel plan so that one can learn new things. For example, in order for planning appropriately, one should be aware of prerequisite of travel and search for recreational places, route maps, climate condition, and historical places, which all increase one's knowledge. As a point in view, last year, my friend and I decided to travel Turkey without a tour. So, we both searched a lot in order to find places and restaurants that we both liked, which helped us not only had a fantastic travel, but also learn a great deal of points about Turkey.
Last but not the least reason is that given the existing economic situation, people should be more conservative in spending their fortune, and striving to save their money as much as they can, and spend them in serious issues. Nowadays, traveling with a tour is often costly, and people are required to pay even every ordinary charges of their travel. Accordingly, travel without a tour not only is more economical, but also gives one an opportunity to save more money.
In summary, having considered all the aforementioned ingredients discussed above, I firmly endorse my point of view that even though travel with a tour has several privileges, the merits of traveling without a tour outweigh those of traveling with a tour on the grounds that it helps one to enhance his or her general information, have more freedom, and decrease his or her travel expense and save more money
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | Pham Ngoc Anh | 76 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important for the young people than theyare to the older people. 73
- Tpo 25 70
- The extended family is less important now than it was in the past 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to take risks and explore new things when you are older than when you are young 55
- TPO 40 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ectic life, everybody has to be in rush so as to not to be left behind in contending for...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in summary', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.207650273224 0.229887763892 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.145719489982 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0783242258652 0.0866891130778 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0601092896175 0.046263068375 130% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0546448087432 0.0685040099705 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136612021858 0.118717715034 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0382513661202 0.0351676179071 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7694263345 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0309653916211 0.0309702414327 100% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0819672131148 0.0887237588012 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0145719489982 0.0209618222197 70% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0127504553734 0.0139019557991 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2779.0 2387.08602151 116% => OK
No of words: 480.0 408.028673835 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78958333333 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.329166666667 0.338922669872 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.233333333333 0.251872472559 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.154166666667 0.174417080927 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.1125 0.112833075102 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7694263345 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5125 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 60.0545437254 59.2087087015 101% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6684587814 77% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5533526081 146% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6224838562 48.84282405 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.6875 120.699889404 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.5533526081 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.644075263715 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 53.3333333333 45.7405998639 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.46853146853 1.45489161554 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352546344766 0.300154397459 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102089007694 0.103427244359 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0533202902106 0.0752933317313 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.559624478303 0.497263757937 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153607835046 0.151897553556 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148094441699 0.114077575197 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822789876781 0.0781384742642 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.329030344802 0.336927656856 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.040777480697 0.067059652881 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234075374553 0.210909579961 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701589251584 0.0618886996521 113% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.