Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Essay topics:

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There is an ongoing controversy argument that whether governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. However, in my opinion, I believe that spending money on railways can make more benefit than using it for roads for several reasons.

First, train is the cheaper way to travel than car or bus. People should get the valuable public transport with the minimum cost and the government should provide the sufficient support for that. For instance, in my country, the train cost only 5 pounds to travel from Bangkok to Chiangmai, compared to the bus, which cost 12 pounds. Clearly, the governments should invest on railways more to ensure that people in their countries get the reasonable public transportation.

Second, the railways’ system emit less pollution than the roads’ system. Nowadays, most cars still need oil to make to possible move. Consequently, the carbon that was produced from the car engines will damage the environment and harm the living creatures. In contrast, the trains can use other clean energy, such as electricity, to propel the train instead of oil. This innovation reduces the significant level of environment problems that humans are now terrified. So the governments ought to persuade people to use this clean technology by spending more money on the railways, rather than the roads.

In conclusion, investing on railways contributes more benefits on roads. It brings the cheaper way of transportation and causes less pollution to the environment. I strongly believe that the world will be better if the governments invest more on the railways.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 Dungphung 56 view
2020-01-29 BIBHU KALITA 11 view
2020-01-29 tranhien297 61 view
2020-01-28 pateldhruv1708 73 view
2020-01-26 geforce 61 view
Essays by user pakasai :

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'in my opinion']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.286689419795 0.247107183377 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.119453924915 0.155533422707 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0784982935154 0.0946595960268 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0409556313993 0.0501214627716 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0238907849829 0.0437548338989 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126279863481 0.122226691241 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0238907849829 0.0403226058552 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85687379933 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.037542662116 0.0326793684256 115% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102389078498 0.0861772015684 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0307167235495 0.021408717616 143% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00682593856655 0.011925033212 57% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1605.0 1933.35771543 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 316.048096192 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.26953125 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20517956788 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.41015625 0.374742101984 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.2890625 0.28420135186 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21484375 0.203846283523 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.13671875 0.137316102897 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85687379933 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.037074148 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.56093040696 103% => OK
Word variations: 58.843916578 60.7387585426 97% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0666666667 20.7743622355 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4222942553 49.517814964 55% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 127.492653851 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.7743622355 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.866666666667 0.814263465372 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 45.9729166667 49.1944974215 93% => OK
Elegance: 2.37037037037 1.69124875643 140% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210479585571 0.332605444948 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0846188191721 0.102741220458 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0602890129135 0.0668466124924 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.568979334314 0.534860350844 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.135415013053 0.148594505496 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103593957813 0.134430193775 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859905009854 0.0742795772207 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.3769982452 0.324371583561 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.171697677473 0.0638462369009 269% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167878752428 0.228012699653 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650104192141 0.058150111329 112% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.