The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the amount of typical carbon dioxide emissions per person in four countries, which are United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal from 1967 to 2007. Unit is measured by metric tonnes.
Overall, the total amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person wasn’t changed much during that period. However, the amount was increased continuously in Italy and Portugal, while it was decreased a lot in United Kingdom and Sweden.
With regards to the volume of carbon dioxide emissions per person of Italy, it was doubled from around 4 metric tonnes per head in 1967 to almost 8 met...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-09 | anhminhbnvn1 | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-01 | marziiramezanii | view | |
| 2020-04-06 | pris | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-18 | Luc1Ferrr | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-06 | pris | 72 | view |
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do your agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 67
- In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart's Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the 1960's, 70
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'likewise', 'so', 'while', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.308370044053 0.268076937826 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.0925110132159 0.116061578633 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0616740088106 0.0759168565197 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0396475770925 0.0366838410393 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0220264317181 0.0131127313244 168% => OK
Prepositions: 0.154185022026 0.155750635184 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0220264317181 0.0379272487307 58% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51588160269 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0264317180617 0.0210936926555 125% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0528634361233 0.0948980150116 56% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00881057268722 0.00967000014798 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1186.0 1161.00487805 102% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.9 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9898989899 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73763899035 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.454545454545 0.337110787985 135% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.242424242424 0.247514529752 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.126262626263 0.171178102325 74% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0909090909091 0.112407865282 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51588160269 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.546246751206 98% => OK
Word variations: 47.3524790626 49.3433353143 96% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0094962315 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3388385317 42.9750493124 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.777777778 135.714022679 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.0094962315 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.689975730869 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 46.2424242424 47.7609492067 97% => OK
Elegance: 3.14285714286 2.94281807926 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3634564396 0.418131533498 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121885071493 0.181151798455 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.14607259562 0.0850326197045 172% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.650313762311 0.706616315825 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.206476524406 0.157042692854 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193463027581 0.228904883108 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113240059022 0.108899403657 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.407585611882 0.367819155151 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.144037720345 0.0812612215331 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302541062245 0.316326947829 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880909558589 0.0921553760075 96% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.