replacement for the automobile's engine source of power
The reading and the lecture are both about replacement for the automobile's engine source of power, which is about using hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine. The author of the reading believes that it has several advantages over internal-combustion engines, but the lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks there is not advantages in using hydrogen.
First of all, the author claims that our petroleoum resource will be deplete but hedrogen has many various sources. This point is challenged by the lecture. She says that hedrogen not easily drived from water or any other sources and it is difficult to produce hedrogen and it is not practical.
Secondly, the author states that heydrogen-based engine is appealing, because it reduce the pollution in the air. He argues if we use hedrogen in our engine, we have less carbon dioxide. This argument is rebutted by the lecture. She states that producing hedrogens need to burn oil and burning the oil is anther problem for polluting the air.
Finally, the author mentions that fuel-cell engine will be vry economical and people will prefer to use these engines. The lecture, on the other hand, feels that it is not economical because thay have to use platinum for producing electricity and using platinum is not economical.
In conclusion, the lecture and reading are both about using hedrogen inatead of petroleum, and the professor effectively challenges the claims made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'automobiles'' or 'automobile's'?
Suggestion: automobiles'; automobile's
...ture are both about replacement for the automobiles engine source of power, which is about ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
...n-based engine is appealing, because it reduce the pollution in the air. He argues if ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'in conclusion', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248091603053 0.261695866417 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.187022900763 0.158904122519 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0725190839695 0.0723426182421 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0419847328244 0.0435111971325 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0496183206107 0.0277247811725 179% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12213740458 0.128828473217 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0534351145038 0.0370669169778 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84499704596 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0152671755725 0.0208969081088 73% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.110687022901 0.128158765124 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0114503816794 0.0158828679856 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00381679389313 0.0114777025283 33% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1464.0 1645.83664459 89% => OK
No of words: 238.0 271.125827815 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1512605042 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390756302521 0.374372842146 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294117647059 0.287516216867 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.218487394958 0.187439937562 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126050420168 0.113142543107 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84499704596 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516806722689 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 48.0506218465 53.8517498576 89% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.3076923077 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9057624502 49.3711431718 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 132.220823453 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.769230769231 0.878197800319 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 47.7194570136 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.52054794521 1.90840788429 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266540946356 0.549887131256 48% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0879527315627 0.142949733639 62% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0644390485729 0.0787303798458 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.599142907278 0.631733273073 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.202664673261 0.139662658121 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11340207164 0.266732575781 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104159551846 0.103435571967 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.273911880585 0.414875509568 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0466365871071 0.0530846634433 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170314605992 0.40443939384 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956940051815 0.0528353158467 181% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.