Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
At this juncture, it is pertinent to begin with a definition of the word "scandal". A scandal can be said to be an occurrence whereby a celebrity or public person, such as a politician is publicly disgraced because of some particular actions he/she took wrongly, which in turn could affect the person’s reputation.
I agree with the prompt, which states that scandals are useful, as they tend to highlight and emphasize the problems better than any speaker can. Scandals are more objective and free of bias, and they re-sound the moral lesson even better than a speaker would. To begin with, a speaker can only say what he/she has knowledge of, while a scandal fully exposes the problem, without any alterations or anything being clandestine.
In addition to this, scandals tend to be more objective in exposing the problems. When a speaker or a reformer tries to address a problem, the speaker may highlight parts of the problem they want to discuss, thereby resulting in the speaker being biased. However, the resulting consequences of a scandal objectively depict the problem. Furthermore, these resulting consequences also seem to be more persuasive as a moral lesson to the society. For instance, when Tiger Woods had an affair and cheated on his wife, the resulting consequence was that it affected his career, as he lost some important endorsement just because of that single act.
In conclusion, scandals are highly useful in focusing in focusing our attention on a problem because scandals are more objective in nature as they play out by themselves, and they tend to reverberate the moral lesson even better than a speaker would.
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little i 50
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little i 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in focusing'.
Suggestion: in focusing
... conclusion, scandals are highly useful in focusing in focusing our attention on a problem because scan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.207667731629 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.162939297125 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0575079872204 0.0880659088768 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0638977635783 0.0497285424764 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0415335463259 0.0444667217837 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121405750799 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.038338658147 0.0406280797675 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96331789302 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0351437699681 0.030933414821 114% => OK
Particles: 0.00319488817891 0.0016655270985 192% => OK
Determiners: 0.124600638978 0.0997080785238 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0223642172524 0.0249443105267 90% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0191693290735 0.0148568991511 129% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1665.0 2732.02544248 61% => OK
No of words: 273.0 452.878318584 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0989010989 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.58838876751 89% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388278388278 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318681318681 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21978021978 0.200843997647 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139194139194 0.132149295362 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96331789302 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 219.290929204 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545787545788 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 54.7218949556 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 24.8181818182 23.380412469 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0131076668 59.4972553346 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.363636364 141.124799967 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 23.380412469 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 0.674092028746 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 56.6863136863 51.4728631049 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.36904761905 1.64882698954 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396183543283 0.391690518653 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133108241968 0.123202303941 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0820099919845 0.077325440228 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.621146648105 0.547984918172 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.160328497922 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171854236586 0.161403998019 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093273875084 0.0892212321368 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.281563109068 0.385218514788 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0761089287425 0.0692045440612 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26095960932 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568502829042 0.0653680567796 87% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.4325221239 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.