Comparison between the Japanese tourist numbers in between 1985 and 1995.
The former bar chart depicts the number of Japanese travel to the abroad, over a time course of 10 years, since 1985, measured in millions, whereas, the latter graph illustrates the share of Japanese tourists in Australia, over the same time period, measured in the percentage.
Over the period as a whole, the number of travellers to abroad from Japan significantly rose, over a time, and the same increasing trend was analysed in Australia - of Japanese tourists - as well.
In detail, the number of abroad travelled from Japan increase gradually with the same constant ratio, in first 5 years from 1985. Eventually, by observing an increase of approximately the half million tourists every year, the foreign Japanese tourist numbers ended at 10.5 Million in 1990 from 4.5 million in 1985. However, in the year 1992 and 1993, the numbers were same (12 million), before the slight fall in the year 1991. In the last 2 years, the foreign country visitors rose steeply with compared to the previous year ratio as approximately 1.8 million more people started the foreign trips, every year - which ended at roughly 15.1 million, in the year 1995.
On the other hand, the same increasing phenomena were analysed in the visit of Japanese to Australia, but on the smaller scale. Even, in this case, the abrupt growing trend was noticed up to the year 1988 (5%). In next years as well, the same increasing trend was found but minor fall occurred between the year 1988 in 1989. Interestingly, there was no Japanese visited Australia in the year 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-15 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- Co2 emission in main four region in between 1967 and 2007. 73
- Electricity generation using wave power. 78
- Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind as it is more importance than design To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- nowadays people prefer to shop in large supermarkets rather than nearby local shops why do you think this happens is this a positive or negative try and give your opinion and example from your own experience 62
- The tabular graph compares usage of rail transport system in 2007. 73
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'well', 'whereas', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.21926910299 0.268076937826 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.0963455149502 0.116061578633 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.093023255814 0.0759168565197 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0531561461794 0.0366838410393 145% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.14950166113 0.155750635184 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0431893687708 0.0379272487307 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.54105127356 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0166112956811 0.0210936926555 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00332225913621 0.00175180941692 190% => OK
Determiners: 0.132890365449 0.0948980150116 140% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00332225913621 0.00967000014798 34% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1545.0 1161.00487805 133% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.9 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85227272727 5.90752243213 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73763899035 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.329545454545 0.337110787985 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.253787878788 0.247514529752 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.166666666667 0.171178102325 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0757575757576 0.112407865282 67% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54105127356 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.546246751206 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.0933415189 49.3433353143 99% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.4 23.0094962315 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9400492762 42.9750493124 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.5 135.714022679 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 23.0094962315 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.689975730869 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 51.7787878788 47.7609492067 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.75555555556 2.94281807926 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361900040864 0.418131533498 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.241938421852 0.181151798455 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10083827244 0.0850326197045 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.750634936587 0.706616315825 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143933296436 0.157042692854 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186100628555 0.228904883108 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038744254556 0.108899403657 36% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.468851381589 0.367819155151 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0738374087926 0.0812612215331 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234087315597 0.316326947829 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529342009538 0.0921553760075 57% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70731707317 216% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.16585365854 253% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.