A society develops the technology in communicating devices rapidly such as smart phones, tablets and other communicating devices. Some people claims that the disadvantages of such device outweigh the advantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to the technological development, the faster, easier and convenient aspects have been enabling to achieve the quality of standard of living. Even if there are psychological and physical damages using such device, we cannot put a halt onto its production or usages because the advantages for convenience and comfortableness brought to the society cannot outweigh its disadvantages.
Technology development has brought our lifestyles become convenient. Nowadays, the youth is known as an information age since the information received from the technological devices are massive. With this, people can make global friends and can be able to grasp various knowledge. For the company's perspective, they can easily connect and communicate with the international departments that can provide the opportunity for broaden the companies. Therefore, the communication technology development had improved the way of communicating between people and which has enhanced the standard of living.
In contrast, it is undeniable that the physical damages and psychological damages would be inevitable by using of this device for a long period. The most common physical damages can be the addictions, ADHD, eyesight, backache, turtle neck syndrome and other psychological damages. Those psychological impact would be relating to the social skills which are significantly decreasing for the young generations. It is very common to see that the young teenagers are having a difficulty to physical communication with others without having their technological devices' help. The development of technologies in communicating devices can result in various harmful effects in people's mind and body as well as their social skills, but it cannot remove such device from our daily usage.
Despite all those fatal impact on people's mind and body, the communicating device is helpful in our society. Since the geographical isolation is no-longer disturbing in the people's relationship, people can easily communicate with anyone at their convenient. Therefore, it is difficult to control its usage.
In conclusion, the technological development has enabling our society become comfortable and the standard of living to be enhanced by making whole world link together. Although there are some drawbacks of using the communicating devices in psychological, physical and societal effects, its beneficial is outweigh its drawbacks.
- Some countries are not popular with using a bicycle even though it is beneficial for them. Why?What are the possible solutions to encourage people to use more of bicycle as the main transport? 61
- Some people believe that government should spend money on new building rather than renovating existing building. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 73
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 84
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 36
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...solation is no-longer disturbing in the peoples relationship, people can easily communi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...and societal effects, its beneficial is outweigh its drawbacks.
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247474747475 0.247107183377 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.146464646465 0.155533422707 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.121212121212 0.0946595960268 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0353535353535 0.0501214627716 71% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0454545454545 0.0437548338989 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113636363636 0.122226691241 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0505050505051 0.0403226058552 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.28040745284 2.80594681477 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0227272727273 0.0326793684256 70% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0934343434343 0.0861772015684 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.030303030303 0.021408717616 142% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00757575757576 0.011925033212 64% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2403.0 1933.35771543 124% => OK
No of words: 357.0 316.048096192 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.73109243697 6.12580529183 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.46218487395 0.374742101984 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.366946778711 0.28420135186 129% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.260504201681 0.203846283523 128% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.190476190476 0.137316102897 139% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28040745284 2.80594681477 117% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.037074148 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.56093040696 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 55.8756272133 60.7387585426 92% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1109359224 49.517814964 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.352941176 127.492653851 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7743622355 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.470588235294 0.814263465372 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 57.6946778711 49.1944974215 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.81111111111 1.69124875643 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423760267037 0.332605444948 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104828826233 0.102741220458 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0815516642881 0.0668466124924 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.542656021627 0.534860350844 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147521031871 0.148594505496 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160772332837 0.134430193775 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725345707568 0.0742795772207 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.337379003553 0.324371583561 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0581244820785 0.0638462369009 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27649590857 0.228012699653 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420986357702 0.058150111329 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.