The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Teaching effectually is a titanic task while maintaining a good atmosphere. In my view, the author's assertion is a bit extreme. Its agreeable that a sanguine approach and surrounding, helps learning in an immensely effective way, prasing positive points of a learner. But, avoiding the negative points of a learner is also not acceptable. I am in a partial agreement with the author's statement.
Firstly, teaching is a process of giving knowledge. Each teacher, parent, coach, etc, has its own approach how to edify a learner. Some of them opts as the author says- the best way to teach by praising positive actions of a learner. This approach lifts the morale of the learner to its very high, helping to burgeon. As this approach of praise boosts the self confidence of the learner, the probability of getting positive results undoubtedly increases.
Secondly, the positive atmosphere which is created due to this plausible way of teaching, inspires a learner to exceed his/her own expectations. The learner tries to put in extra efforts as the repercussion of the positivity which tends to make best out them.
However, not providing a complete feedback to the learner ignoring their negative actions might prove costly for them in the long run. They should be told, in what they are lacking so that they could ameliorate over their frailties. But, an important factor that needs to be considered is the way in which the learners are to be counseled over their negative points. It should be kept in mind that a student does not get dissuaded, which could lead to grave consequences such as low confidence, diffidence, etc.
To sum up, I would suggest that the negative points must be shared with learners, playing a vital role in their overall development, helping them to prosper and to reach to their desired highs. In my opinion, if the approach of edifying learners by praising positive actions is merged with effective counseling of negative points would lead to better results and would be more effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- In order for any work of art like a film or a novel or a poem or a song to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 70
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 70
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- All college and university students would benefit from spending at least one semester studying in a foreign country.” 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ning a good atmosphere. In my view, the authors assertion is a bit extreme. Its agreeab...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e. I am in a partial agreement with the authors statement. Firstly, teaching is a pr...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'while', 'such as', 'in my opinion', 'in my view', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.201058201058 0.240241500013 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.174603174603 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103174603175 0.0880659088768 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0291005291005 0.0497285424764 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0555555555556 0.0444667217837 125% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108465608466 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0661375661376 0.0406280797675 163% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80079084862 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0449735449735 0.030933414821 145% => OK
Particles: 0.00793650793651 0.0016655270985 477% => OK
Determiners: 0.108465608466 0.0997080785238 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0238095238095 0.0249443105267 95% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0185185185185 0.0148568991511 125% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2021.0 2732.02544248 74% => OK
No of words: 337.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99703264095 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376854599407 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.320474777448 0.280924506359 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.228486646884 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112759643917 0.132149295362 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80079084862 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543026706231 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 58.3374961691 55.4138127331 105% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7222222222 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1521854732 59.4972553346 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.277777778 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.674092028746 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 50.769699967 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.44897959184 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407812389857 0.391690518653 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114139006661 0.123202303941 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0838222967269 0.077325440228 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.554783479725 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162348751499 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149027061027 0.161403998019 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943627518909 0.0892212321368 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.354385904877 0.385218514788 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0916067682215 0.0692045440612 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257907619531 0.275328986314 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597215749897 0.0653680567796 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.