Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
The author of the claim contends that the information about the past is useless in the process of making a decision in the current. It is a claim with which I generally agree. I will delve into the most conspicuous reasons in what follows.
First of all, one should take account this significant point the there is no link between the problems of the past time and modern day. Indeed, if the transportation of the long distance or the preservation of the food for the winter usage were the biggest problems in the past, with which people had been faced, nowadays, the problems are deep rooted. In modern life, people tackled problems such as the lack of the occupation for the people. According to the noteworthy, the intelligible survey conducted in my country, approximately by each decade the individuals' concerns alter the duration, and they become more severe and knotty than the previous decade. As there is no relationship between the problems, the knowledge of the past event is irrelevant to cope with the current problem.
Another equally striking point justifying my outlook is that there is a difference between the living conditions and life standard. It is explicit as a crystal that there is a massive development. Nothing seems like the past. This velocity of the enhancement is too fast which ceases the relationship between the past and ongoing. As a result, based on the scanty of connection, the comparison or gaining the advantage of the past is an abortive task. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the issue is my and my mother's instance. There is a thirty years difference between my mom and me. As my mother lived in the environment with the less-equipped with technology, she had the difficulty with her daily household tasks such as the cleaning the dishes or cooking. Otherwise, I have a more convenient lifestyle, if I define my concern due to my mother's problem. However, the technology advanced my life in this area, and I do not have to worry about it.
Nevertheless, as far as the reason is concerned, I do not agree with the author is some extent. Although there is a weak link between the modern life and past, knowing about the history provides a holistic understanding view about the surrounding. At least the information of the past presents this opportunity to a person to eliminate some guaranteed to fail option. For instance, for the sake of failure and drawback of the war in the past, the people can learn the war is not decent choice to achieve their goals; even though the issues led to the conflict and battle conditions are varied in this long duration. Thereby this knowledge demonstrates the complete scheme of the subject.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned arguments lead to the conclusion that although the awareness of the past presents an entire angel toward the life, as the living condition and type of difficulties are changed in this span, this knowledge is useless. All in all, I firmly recommend for solving an issue, it is a wise and sound option to focus on the details of subject to address it accurately.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 62
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Programs made in one's own country are more interesting than those made in other countries. 80
- tpo43 81
- tpo10 76
- In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... is no link between the problems of the past time and modern day. Indeed, if the transpor...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'at least', 'for instance', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240802675585 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.128762541806 0.157235817809 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0719063545151 0.0880659088768 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0334448160535 0.0497285424764 67% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0451505016722 0.0444667217837 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130434782609 0.12292977631 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0301003344482 0.0406280797675 74% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86896764112 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0234113712375 0.030933414821 76% => OK
Particles: 0.00167224080268 0.0016655270985 100% => OK
Determiners: 0.170568561873 0.0997080785238 171% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0066889632107 0.0249443105267 27% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00836120401338 0.0148568991511 56% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3105.0 2732.02544248 114% => OK
No of words: 534.0 452.878318584 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81460674157 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.58838876751 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.333333333333 0.366273622748 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256554307116 0.280924506359 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183520599251 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.11797752809 0.132149295362 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86896764112 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 219.290929204 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 59.9901735186 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.36 23.380412469 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4644633374 59.4972553346 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.36 23.380412469 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.44 0.674092028746 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 47.0154307116 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.93548387097 1.64882698954 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258621954418 0.391690518653 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.130517825016 0.123202303941 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.080168134708 0.077325440228 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.571561928566 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.184450097512 0.149214159877 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117503135107 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704001901136 0.0892212321368 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.59973894799 0.385218514788 156% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0363868793769 0.0692045440612 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202063138678 0.275328986314 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459888478318 0.0653680567796 70% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.30420353982 245% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 10.0 3.66592920354 273% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.