The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
The table illustrates the percentage of school children attending four different types of secondary school from 2000 to 2009. It is evident that the specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled schools experienced declines in numbers of pupils, whereas the community schools became the most important providers of secondary school education during the same period.
To begin, the proportion in voluntary-controlled schools fell from just over half to only 20% or one fifth from 2000 to 2009. Similarly, the relative number of children in grammar schools -- just under one quarter -- dropped by half in the same period. As for the specialist schools, the relatively small percentage of pupils attending this type of school (12%) also fell, although not significantly.
However, while the other three types of school declined in importance, the opposite was true in the case of community schools. In fact, while only a small minority of 12% were educated in these schools in 2000, this figure increased to well over half of all pupils during the following nine years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-27 | Rizvi007 | 84 | view |
2019-09-21 | rose_3012 | 78 | view |
2019-09-21 | MaKay1990 | 73 | view |
2019-08-21 | harshiniharshini | 84 | view |
2019-08-21 | harshiniharshini | 61 | view |
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video. 73
- The bar chart shows the import and export of Canada (values in $) from 1991 to 1995. 56
- The chart shows student expenditure over a three-year period in the United Kingdom 73
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'similarly', 'so', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'as for', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.273684210526 0.268076937826 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.0736842105263 0.116061578633 63% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0842105263158 0.0759168565197 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0631578947368 0.0366838410393 172% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00526315789474 0.0131127313244 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.189473684211 0.155750635184 122% => OK
Participles: 0.0210526315789 0.0379272487307 56% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.08852099519 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0263157894737 0.0210936926555 125% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.105263157895 0.0948980150116 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1067.0 1161.00487805 92% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.9 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.27647058824 5.90752243213 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73763899035 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388235294118 0.337110787985 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305882352941 0.247514529752 124% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.217647058824 0.171178102325 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.147058823529 0.112407865282 131% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08852099519 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.546246751206 107% => OK
Word variations: 51.308995799 49.3433353143 104% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 8.93414634146 78% => OK
Sentence length: 24.2857142857 23.0094962315 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8539914688 42.9750493124 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.428571429 135.714022679 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 23.0094962315 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 0.689975730869 228% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 54.8739495798 47.7609492067 115% => OK
Elegance: 3.40740740741 2.94281807926 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38246281582 0.418131533498 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165531455234 0.181151798455 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0438337652267 0.0850326197045 52% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.702110166158 0.706616315825 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.102232350125 0.157042692854 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230741287116 0.228904883108 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131002920315 0.108899403657 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.476896223864 0.367819155151 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0181391245081 0.0812612215331 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30935180118 0.316326947829 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120356968166 0.0921553760075 131% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.