Governments give a lot of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this era of modernization, artwork has undergone lots of dramatic changes over the past few decades. Presently, government is tended to endorse artists to glorify their country's name in art sector. However, some people does not welcome this tendency of government and consider it wastage of finance. Here, I would like to discuss both views with my notion.
Ample points are there to shore up former view. Firstly, Artwork portrays the heritage and cultural picture of a particular country. Fascinating performances by artists in art sector glorify a country's name and earn fame for a country. However, spending on artwork is completely justifying. What is more, it takes special skills and patience to be a mesmerizing artist. Thus it is worth to spend on skillful artists in order to justify their talent. On contrary, others have conflicting views.
They claim that, artwork being created by artists is of no use, hence, money ought to be utilized in other needful causes. To be specific, Indian government wasted gigantic 2 millions on R.S.Javed for an art exhibition which could have been utilized as an aid for tsunami affected in 2007. Furthermore, artwork is not that necessary for the better lifestyle, money can be spent on creating opportunities for jobless youngster instead
In my notion, both sides have their own significance. undeniably, some brilliant artists need to be awarded for sake of country's name and fame. however, paying them big amounts without taking local mass's needs in consideration is completely unjustifiable
To recapitulate, government is just like a family leader who has to look after every single member equally, just like that government should manage their funds in the manner that no one remain with the empty palms
- Many people are using credit cards or loans to run up huge personal debts that they may be unable to repay. It should therefore be made more difficult for individuals to borrow large amounts of money. What are your opinion on this?Give reasons for your an 90
- People nowadays live longer than they used to What caused this situation Is it a negative or positive development 78
- In many countries schools have sever problems with student behaviour What do you think What solutions can you suggest 85
- Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events Others think that government should invest money on more important things 96
- Nowadays most parents put a lot of pressure on their children to succeed. What are the reasons for parents to do this? Does it have a positive or a negative effect on children in general? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nd patience to be a mesmerizing artist. Thus it is worth to spend on skillful artist...
^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Javed
...nment wasted gigantic 2 millions on R.S.Javed for an art exhibition which could have ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Undeniably
...both sides have their own significance. undeniably, some brilliant artists need to be awar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ded for sake of countrys name and fame. however, paying them big amounts without taking...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat government should manage their funds in the manner that no one remain with th...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'thus', 'as to', 'what is more']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259375 0.247107183377 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.175 0.155533422707 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.090625 0.0946595960268 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.05 0.0501214627716 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0375 0.0437548338989 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125 0.122226691241 102% => OK
Participles: 0.05 0.0403226058552 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8167346924 2.80594681477 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0375 0.0326793684256 115% => OK
Particles: 0.003125 0.00163938923432 191% => OK
Determiners: 0.06875 0.0861772015684 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015625 0.021408717616 73% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.009375 0.011925033212 79% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1765.0 1933.35771543 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 316.048096192 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17132867133 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20517956788 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.398601398601 0.374742101984 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.321678321678 0.28420135186 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.202797202797 0.203846283523 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108391608392 0.137316102897 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8167346924 2.80594681477 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.037074148 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.56093040696 113% => OK
Word variations: 73.5689674826 60.7387585426 121% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.875 20.7743622355 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0469722363 49.517814964 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.3125 127.492653851 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7743622355 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6875 0.814263465372 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.99599198397 125% => OK
Readability: 50.0428321678 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.65476190476 1.69124875643 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25847323948 0.332605444948 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0544943302193 0.102741220458 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0507296302726 0.0668466124924 76% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.461572120416 0.534860350844 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167460149771 0.148594505496 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958252568153 0.134430193775 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442457269106 0.0742795772207 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.19370704313 0.324371583561 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0819174668155 0.0638462369009 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152206553009 0.228012699653 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566350209448 0.058150111329 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.