“Prevention is better than cure”. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what extent do you agree?
The investment on researching and experiments to cure the maladies is required a huge amount of money. As a result of this, some people claims that the prevention for maladies is more important and should invest on preventative measures. Even though the prevention seems the most optimistic way to achieve, in finance perspective, I believe that this is unrealistic and therefore, I completely disagree with this approach. I think the research for treating diseases is still required.
Nowadays government spends a huge amount of money on researching and experimenting for science and chemical developments. In the US only, it had spent about $2.5 billion of government money solely on chemical developments in 2015. As a result of this, people claim that this money should not be spent on research and development for fixing the illness but it should be used for the prevention of illnesses.
Investing on preparation and prevention for diseases has financial advantages. It is far cheaper than money is required to be spent for researching and curing for diseases. If the government only focuses their money to be used on prevention, they can use the budgeted money to support for other departments such as treasury, military or education. Therefore, the financial part for prevention is beneficial than that of researching and development spending.
Even though there is a financial beneficial to use the money on prevention, in reality this is not feasible, because newer viruses are introduced. For example, the world had faced the fear of viruses of SARS in 2012, MERS in 2015 and ZIKA in 2016. By preventing of all those viruses including the foreseeable viruses could be meaning that scientists have to forecast the development of viruses. To do that, scientists must require grasping sufficient knowledge about human biology, science and chemical developments and also they require of advanced technological supports. The knowledge seeking to prevent foreseeable diseases can take long time and costs, thus the costs for prevention would exceed than the treating diseases.
In conclusion, the prevention of potential diseases is the dream for everyone. However, this is not practically possible since there is insufficient technological availability and lack of knowledge in that field. As a result researching and developing required fields can costs even more than treating, so the research for treating should be continued.
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 84
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspicious of their bene 89
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 67
- The given line chart illustrates the number of people changed between birth and death in Scotland over period 80 years between 1940 and 2020 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...including the foreseeable viruses could be meaning that scientists have to forecast the de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for example', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236966824645 0.247107183377 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.165876777251 0.155533422707 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0781990521327 0.0946595960268 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0473933649289 0.0501214627716 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.021327014218 0.0437548338989 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.158767772512 0.122226691241 130% => OK
Participles: 0.0616113744076 0.0403226058552 153% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.0968129829 2.80594681477 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021327014218 0.0326793684256 65% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0971563981043 0.0861772015684 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0236966824645 0.021408717616 111% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.011925033212 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2433.0 1933.35771543 126% => OK
No of words: 384.0 316.048096192 122% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3359375 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393229166667 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.330729166667 0.28420135186 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.278645833333 0.203846283523 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.197916666667 0.137316102897 144% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0968129829 2.80594681477 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.037074148 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479166666667 0.56093040696 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.0483160627 60.7387585426 84% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.2105263158 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9178811016 49.517814964 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.052631579 127.492653851 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.684210526316 0.814263465372 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 53.2834429825 49.1944974215 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.94949494949 1.69124875643 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249158352037 0.332605444948 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.130072211105 0.102741220458 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0675720455658 0.0668466124924 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.550609688472 0.534860350844 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.081791042385 0.148594505496 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116517272117 0.134430193775 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514958437531 0.0742795772207 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.39894788068 0.324371583561 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0155696838846 0.0638462369009 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183613941322 0.228012699653 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05097529471 0.058150111329 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 1.9629258517 204% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.4468937876 153% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.