Some people believe that government should spend money on new building rather than renovating existing building.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Government should be responsible to pay for constructing of new buildings rather than funding to renovate the buildings. While I understand that the construction of newer buildings can lead to a population emigration between cities which can be expected a future opportunities to grow, the financial and time aspects cannot be ignored. Therefore, the wise constructions should be recommended.
Construction of new buildings has advantages for the areas to improve its environmental view by providing various important buildings. When the government is constructing new buildings, usually those are necessary for those areas such as public health facilities, entertainment complexes, hospitals and schools. With the introduction of newer facilities can lead to a population emigration between cities in order to get the opportunity to try for modernized and cleaner environments. Thus, it can help the areas to have modernized look by constructing various building structures.
However, constructing a new building can take lots of time and money for the government. In Perth, for example, budgeted the money for more than $ 30 billion to design Marine City to be similar to Singapore but which took more than 20 years to construct and due to this delayed in construction causes traffic jams. In opposite, in the case of Melbourne, they renovated their cities every year because of wear and tear, so the money saved from doing renovation instead, had used to improve public health systems – elderly pension services, school facilities and hospital development supports. Therefore, from these two cities use of government monies, we can conclude that the government budgets should use to renovate on buildings so that the rest of monies can be used to improvement of other public benefits and entitlements.
In conclusion, the budgeted money from the government to be used on creating new buildings in the areas can have short term attractiveness from the public as well as financial issues. Therefore, the construction of buildings or renovation of existing buildings should be monitored and watched closely to prevent any financial loss.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 73
- People are living longer than ever before. At the same time, the young population is declining while the number of old people is rising. Will this development be a benefit for the society? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having more old peopl 73
- The chart shows a percentage of live births by age of mother for UK and non-UK born mothers, 2015 56
- One long distance of planes consumes more than a car and it can pollute environment more than cars. Therefore the unnecessary flight such as tourist travelling should be discouraged than limit the car use. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The table below highlights data on the number of travelers using three major German airports between 2007 and 2012 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opportunity'?
Suggestion: opportunity
...n cities which can be expected a future opportunities to grow, the financial and time aspects...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$30'.
Suggestion: $30
...ample, budgeted the money for more than $ 30 billion to design Marine City to be sim...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.267759562842 0.247107183377 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.158469945355 0.155533422707 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0819672131148 0.0946595960268 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0355191256831 0.0501214627716 71% => OK
Pronouns: 0.016393442623 0.0437548338989 37% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133879781421 0.122226691241 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0601092896175 0.0403226058552 149% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.17174979671 2.80594681477 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.051912568306 0.0326793684256 159% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0819672131148 0.0861772015684 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0355191256831 0.021408717616 166% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00819672131148 0.011925033212 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2143.0 1933.35771543 111% => OK
No of words: 334.0 316.048096192 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.41616766467 6.12580529183 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20517956788 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.404191616766 0.374742101984 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.335329341317 0.28420135186 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.263473053892 0.203846283523 129% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.212574850299 0.137316102897 155% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17174979671 2.80594681477 113% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.037074148 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523952095808 0.56093040696 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 55.1003454829 60.7387585426 91% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 25.6923076923 20.7743622355 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0044854266 49.517814964 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.846153846 127.492653851 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7743622355 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 59.225241824 49.1944974215 120% => OK
Elegance: 2.19480519481 1.69124875643 130% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158842827066 0.332605444948 48% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124344902993 0.102741220458 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0544062591937 0.0668466124924 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.594180117877 0.534860350844 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.112451678993 0.148594505496 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818084099964 0.134430193775 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443326191458 0.0742795772207 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.428455265315 0.324371583561 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0211491477331 0.0638462369009 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117353503215 0.228012699653 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247171169817 0.058150111329 43% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.