The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010.
The table illustrates the General IELTS band score received by students from four different countries, Germany, France, Indonesia and Malaysia in 2010.
Overall, German had the highest overall scores whereas the lowest score was achieved by Indonesians. However, Indonesians showed the strongest aspects in Speaking while German showed the weakness in Reading.
To start with, German had the highest in listening, Writing and speaking compared to other three nationalists where they scored at 6.8, 6.6 and 6.9, respectively. Meanwhile, Indonesian scored 6.3 in Listening, 6.7 in Speaking and, 6.1 each in Writing and Reading. In contrast, Reading section was the weakest for German students as recorded at 6.3.
The highest score for Reading was rewarded to Malaysian of 6.4 band scores. However, they scored the lowest in the rest of sections; 6.2 in Listening, 6.0 in Writing and 6.6 in Speaking. Alternatively, French students also had a similar score as Indonesian in Listening and Reading of 6.3 and 6.1, respectively. While Writing and Speaking scored 6.5 and 6.6 each for French students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-10 | nguyen.buituan | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | singhisking | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | kachiamoto | view | |
| 2021-06-08 | singhisking | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | Jagroop kaur | 100 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most experiences in our lives that seem difficult at the time become valuable lessons for the future. 67
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 61
- The chart shows student expenditure over a three-year period in the United Kingdom. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 31
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast', 'to start with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.215 0.268076937826 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.125 0.116061578633 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.095 0.0759168565197 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.035 0.0366838410393 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.01 0.0131127313244 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145 0.155750635184 93% => OK
Participles: 0.055 0.0379272487307 145% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8154126046 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.015 0.0210936926555 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.07 0.0948980150116 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.005 0.00967000014798 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1103.0 1161.00487805 95% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.9 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.41279069767 5.90752243213 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73763899035 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.447674418605 0.337110787985 133% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.360465116279 0.247514529752 146% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.25 0.171178102325 146% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133720930233 0.112407865282 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8154126046 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.546246751206 98% => OK
Word variations: 44.8714402489 49.3433353143 91% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2 23.0094962315 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4892962356 42.9750493124 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.3 135.714022679 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 23.0094962315 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.689975730869 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 53.2465116279 47.7609492067 111% => OK
Elegance: 2.44117647059 2.94281807926 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334912545693 0.418131533498 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.194469956273 0.181151798455 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.072785723445 0.0850326197045 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.653782327253 0.706616315825 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165158870132 0.157042692854 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172762535046 0.228904883108 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108310361199 0.108899403657 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.370567362279 0.367819155151 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.185711552472 0.0812612215331 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264487537287 0.316326947829 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993203174286 0.0921553760075 108% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.14146341463 263% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.