People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.
The author in the above issue talks about people’s attitude with the respect to immediate situation to that of the society. I would like to state that, I am in complete agreement with that of the author. There are multiple reason for my agreement with the author view. I shall endeavour my perception for the above paragraph.
Firstly, above statement bolster that people attitude is define by immediate situation taken by him than that of the society. He says that people attitude is known by way of handling immediate situation or surroundings. I am totally standing with the author’s view. Moreover, there are various reason that prompt my approval. In the light of the topic, it is quite imperative. Furthermore, It asserts that immediate decision power defines the people’s attitude. Hence there seems no loop hole in it.
Secondly, If you are placed in the job placement than the interviewer may counter you an immediate decision taking question to check the presence of your mind and confidence on yourself for immediate situation. Thus during that span of the time, Positive attitude towards immediate situation leads the way out it. However, People attitude is not only determined by the immediate situation but also by the attitude towards the society. If an individual do well in the society than surely he will gain reputation from the surroundings. As the two side of the coins, So is that with that of the people attitude towards the society and immediate situation handling. But I bolster that people attitude must be determined by their immediate situation.
To wrap up my discussion over this issue ,I would like to the bulk of evidence. Thus we can conclude that person's attitude is dependent on the immediate action or solution taken by the person rather than society as a whole. After all life has many options, We take some while we abandon some.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | Amberkury | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Mirzz | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | krishnaprasad7 | 50 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | abc221 | 33 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Inbar Amit | 66 | view |
- Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future 50
- Nations should suspend govt. funding forthe arts when significant numbers of theircitizens are hungry and unemployed. 16
- "Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs in Clearview have fallen significantly during the past year, and taxes rema 50
- "Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many s 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'defined'.
Suggestion: defined
...atement bolster that people attitude is define by immediate situation taken by him tha...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...wer defines the people's attitude. Hence there seems no loop hole in it. Second...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ce on yourself for immediate situation. Thus during that span of the time, Positive ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...so by the attitude towards the society. If an individual do well in the society th...
^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...To wrap up my discussion over this issue ,I would like to the bulk of evidence. Th...
^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... ,I would like to the bulk of evidence. Thus we can conclude that persons attitude i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... of evidence. Thus we can conclude that persons attitude is dependent on the immediate ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'after all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240223463687 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.131284916201 0.157235817809 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0642458100559 0.0880659088768 73% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0391061452514 0.0497285424764 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0698324022346 0.0444667217837 157% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.159217877095 0.12292977631 130% => OK
Participles: 0.0251396648045 0.0406280797675 62% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77270284711 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0167597765363 0.030933414821 54% => OK
Particles: 0.00279329608939 0.0016655270985 168% => OK
Determiners: 0.120111731844 0.0997080785238 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0195530726257 0.0249443105267 78% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00558659217877 0.0148568991511 38% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1884.0 2732.02544248 69% => OK
No of words: 315.0 452.878318584 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98095238095 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355555555556 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288888888889 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.234920634921 0.200843997647 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149206349206 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77270284711 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 219.290929204 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 52.1286046127 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.75 23.380412469 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7905767739 59.4972553346 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 141.124799967 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 23.380412469 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.85 0.674092028746 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 44.6388888889 51.4728631049 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.76744186047 1.64882698954 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241428289666 0.391690518653 62% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120763952351 0.123202303941 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10684259072 0.077325440228 138% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.513124355554 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155909191412 0.149214159877 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998208962632 0.161403998019 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10247363865 0.0892212321368 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.447090780678 0.385218514788 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.109247633148 0.0692045440612 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168059597805 0.275328986314 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719104499477 0.0653680567796 110% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.