The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting the supply of new housing, could lead to significant increases in the price of housing in the county. Proponents of the measure note that Chestnut County established a similar measure ten years ago, and its housing prices have increased only modestly since. However, opponents of the measure note that Pine County adopted restrictions on the development of new residential housing fifteen years ago, and its housing prices have since more than doubled. The council currently predicts that the proposed measure, if passed, will result in a significant increase in housing prices in Maple County
The author in the above argument concludes that if the proposed measure passed than it would will gain magnificent increase in the housing price. The author has come up with many inappropriate evidence for his conclusion. There seems many loop for the above argument. I have completely disagreement with that of the author. I would like to elaborate in above paragraph.
First of all, the author has made conclusion with the respect of the another county which seem very improper. As we cannot the compare one county with that of the other. Different county may have different factor which gain advantage. As the condition changes with that of different environment. So this is very illogical comparison made. As, author says that the restriction will thus increase the price of the housing is just improper. The author did not mention measure to increase but he leads his way with the conclusion.
Furthermore, the author say that before ten years ago, chestnut county made a similar measure which resulted with the increase in the housing it also seems improper. As to rely on the information of the few years is just unjustified. Similarly, the author compares with that of the pine county with that of fifteen years ago situation. As the time changes, so the situations changes and thus to be take decision over this is unjustifiable.
Thus to wrap my discussion over this argument, I would like to bulk all over evidence as a whole. As the author takes decision with the respect of the with another county is just unground. The author had made many evidence without any solid ground. If the author had made sounding evidence than it would lead its way through the conclusion. Thus, I am completely in disagreement with that of the author.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 82 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | samramjam12345 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | cnegus | 63 | view |
- Previous experience has shown that our stores are most profitable in areas where residents are highly concerned with leading healthy lives. We should therefore build our next new store in Plainsville, which has many such residents. Plainsville merchants r 66
- Scientist and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 50
- "Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs in Clearview have fallen significantly during the past year, and taxes rema 50
- Nations should suspend govt. funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry and unemployed. 50
- Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[4]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much inappropriate evidence', 'a good deal of inappropriate evidence'.
Suggestion: much inappropriate evidence; a good deal of inappropriate evidence
...sing price. The author has come up with many inappropriate evidence for his conclusion. There seems many lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun loop seems to be countable; consider using: 'many loops'.
Suggestion: many loops
...vidence for his conclusion. There seems many loop for the above argument. I have complete...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nother county which seem very improper. As we cannot the compare one county with t...
^^
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... different factor which gain advantage. As the condition changes with that of diff...
^^
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...this is very illogical comparison made. As, author says that the restriction will ...
^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in the housing it also seems improper. As to rely on the information of the few y...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... decision over this is unjustifiable. Thus to wrap my discussion over this argumen...
^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e to bulk all over evidence as a whole. As the author takes decision with the resp...
^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much evidence', 'a good deal of evidence'.
Suggestion: much evidence; a good deal of evidence
...y is just unground. The author had made many evidence without any solid ground. If the author...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...many evidence without any solid ground. If the author had made sounding evidence t...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'thus', 'as to', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217125382263 0.25644967241 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.137614678899 0.15541462614 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0733944954128 0.0836205057962 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0642201834862 0.0520304965353 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.039755351682 0.0272364105082 146% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.159021406728 0.125424944231 127% => OK
Participles: 0.0244648318043 0.0416121511921 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68136107163 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0183486238532 0.026700313972 69% => OK
Particles: 0.00305810397554 0.001811407834 169% => OK
Determiners: 0.149847094801 0.113004496875 133% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0244648318043 0.0255425247493 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00917431192661 0.0127820249294 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1750.0 2731.13054187 64% => OK
No of words: 297.0 446.07635468 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89225589226 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.57801047555 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.326599326599 0.378187486979 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.249158249158 0.287650121315 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178451178451 0.208842608468 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121212121212 0.135150697306 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68136107163 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 207.018472906 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464646464646 0.469332199767 99% => OK
Word variations: 45.0824524589 52.1807786196 86% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.039408867 105% => OK
Sentence length: 14.1428571429 23.2022227129 61% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.254568827 57.7814097925 54% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3333333333 141.986410481 59% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 23.2022227129 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52380952381 0.724660767414 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 3.58251231527 279% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 39.0586820587 51.9672348444 75% => OK
Elegance: 1.6582278481 1.8405768891 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483013657417 0.441005458295 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113341452329 0.135418324435 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0922445706186 0.0829849096947 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.522256469843 0.58762219726 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.154420896349 0.147661913831 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211022277739 0.193483328276 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117297608535 0.0970749176394 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.547803864576 0.42659136922 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0761950947966 0.0774707102158 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385436226477 0.312017818177 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061354080645 0.0698173142475 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.82512315271 166% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.82389162562 212% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.