few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development?
Over the last few decades, some global languages such as english, chinese or spanish is gaining the popularity all over the world. Some people think that this trend has a constructive effect on societies while others claim that it is in tandem with the loss of other cultures. My essay will explain both sides of this issue.
On the one hand, the dominance of few global languages may bring about a great deal of benefits in many fields. Economically speaking, this trend can ease the trading and communication. In other words, businessmen who know english are statistically more prosperous in their business due to the fact that they could cooperate and communicate with their counterparts overseas. Another tangible advantage is that students have more opportunities to integrate with a reservoir of knowledge and skills stemming from developed countries. No sooner do they sign in for english course than they are able to gain scholarships to broaden their horizons and start a new life from scratch.
On the other hand, ample drawbacks are seen in this tendency. It is indisputable that the ubiquity of one language is tantamount to the loss of cultural identity of several nations. Examples are noticed only when numerous youngsters attach importance to Western culture by singing international songs, wearing western clothes and attending global occasions more often are traditional values and identity faded away gradually in the young generations’ thoughts and consciences. Besides, this trend can adversely affect to the next generation. For example, people from English-speaking countries spare no money learning foreign courses and become more arrogant because they believe that their language and culture are prevalent and superior to others. Consequently, this can render people of other nations the feeling of being discriminated and subservient.
In conclusion, in conjunction with the efforts of integrating the development of the world, people should be acutely aware of preserving their mother tongue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-27 | bminhanh01 | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-27 | bminhanh01 | 67 | view |
| 2016-10-31 | catus | 89 | view |
- in order to improve the quality of education high school students should be encouraged to evaluate and criticise their teachers but others think that it will result in loss of respect and discipline in classroom what is your opinion 91
- few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is it a positive or negative development? 89
- computer is widely used in education and some people think that teachers will not play important role in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 81
- computers do not help children learn more effectively On the contrary the use of computer has a negative effect on children s physical and mental development Do you agree or disagree 80
- nuclear power is considered to be roughly the best energy compared with other energy sources to growing energy demand in the world. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll explain both sides of this issue. On the one hand, the dominance of few gl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and start a new life from scratch. On the other hand, ample drawbacks are s...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing discriminated and subservient. In conclusion, in conjunction with the e...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44303797468 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95094894289 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1687686546 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113183480568 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372102876507 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327985799919 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680410419115 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278518767334 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.