Manager
Managerial positions in an organization require extremely analytical and intellectual personnel, and some people feel that the younger employees are more suited for the task than the ones older in age. Although this is true for a number of reasons, in this essay we shall also look at whether having mature managers can be beneficial.
It is observed that the younger employees are more techno-savvy than the older ones who may need to be trained every time a new equipment or program is installed in the office that is supposed to be used for work. Also, senior people are typecast and stuck in their own ways of working since they have been working since a long time and are seldom open to change. Nowadays, many organizations have modish office interiors with swanky desks and cubicles and interiors, for example, an advertising agency. While the younger employees would like this bright setting with graffitied walls and a pool table in the middle of the office floor, so to say, the older employees would probably frown on that.
That being said, it cannot be denied that what the older people lack in the latest trends, they make up in experience and knowledge. They have a better understanding of the situations in a workplace and are skilled to be able to predict certain outcomes when it comes to business operations. Also, young people are very enthusiastic and may take decisions in a rush, whereas an older manager would consider all sides of the case and then decide on the course of action. Many times, young managers are seen to follow the rule of ‘more the risk, more the profit’. On the other hand, the older managers might let a few profits go temporarily to secure a bigger long-term financial gain for the company for the future.
Weighing all the arguments, I can conclude that both, young or old managers are fit to be at the managerial positions in a company, depending upon the industry. Expertise, knowledge, and other non-cognitive skills should be considered for any employee to be appointed as the manager.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | too3ig | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | jay1451 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | Ashish-Sharma | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, may, so, then, thus, whereas, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88538681948 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70638222077 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567335243553 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.3674538298 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.153846154 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152436423363 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628569439001 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799381987129 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105332268787 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713644280623 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.