The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate what did school leavers do after graduating from secondary school in Australia from 1980 to 2000.
It is clear from the given charts that there was a upward trend in the proportion of employed school leavers whilst the rate of schoolchildren chose to have further education decreased gradually throughout 20 years.
In 1980, a half of Australian school leavers chose to continue their study after secondary graduation. This rate plummetted to just 38 per cent after a decade and remained relatively stable at 37 per cent 10 years later.
In contrast, the percentage of pupils pursued a job right after leaving secondary school increased steadily over the shown period, from 40 per cent in the initial stage to over a half after 2 decades.
The figure for those who have no job after graduating from secondary school, however, saw a minor fluctuation when this rate rose by 2 per cent to 12 per cent from 1980 to 1990, followed by a decrease to 8 per cent in 2000.
- The table shows the results of survey in a European country which was carried out in three different years It shows the percentages of people who said that they are interested in certain sports 85
- The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008. 61
- Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life? 89
- Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government Some people think that is the good thing while others argue that it is not suitable Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- the three maps shows changes in the village of Kelsbey from 1780 to 2000 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ar from the given charts that there was a upward trend in the proportion of emplo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82558139535 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65200415046 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.1818913775 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217451875589 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134728426421 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841291674566 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140337583108 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656198849695 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.