In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is clear that the inaccessibility to educational systems of students in rural areas has been attracting a great deal of media attention in recent decades. Although the proposal of providing more educational institutions and teachers sounds feasible, I still advocate the provision of computers and Internet access.
There are some reasons why an increase in schools and teachers could solve this problem. First, due to the construction of more schools, students in developing areas would have a variety of choices which schools to attend. This means that their likelihood of approaching an appropriate educational environment inevitable, leading to an improvement in their empirical knowledge and academic skills. Second, If official authorities decide to provide more teachers with professional teaching qualifications, students will be accessible to excellent lectures with a wide range of academic knowledge. This acts as an incentive for a higher degree of learners’ interactions and consultations with teachers, which is instrumental in students’ making progress.
However, a rise in computers and Internet access is much more practical to alleviate this issue. The first reason is that a heavy usage of computer devices would be conducive to pupils’ development of computer skills. For example, an intensity and frequency of using Microsoft Words or PowerPoint could culminate in the betterment of typing and presentation skills, which is vitally important for their future occupations. Another reason is that an easier access to the Internet is invariably associated with the acceleration of both academic and social knowledge acquisitions. Subsequently, they would have a higher opportunity of attending prestigious post-secondary institutions, followed by a higher chance of employment and better social status.
In conclusion, I think computers and the Internet are the most effective means to resolve the lack of education of pupils in rural communities for its substantial impacts on their knowledge as well as future careers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | nguyen thuy an2309 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Dongvo | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | ali_mohammadi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Legendmaker | 100 | view |
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 92
- In recent years children have been given more freedom than in the past Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 70
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 84
- The diagram below gives information about the Mont Blanc road tunnel and the Seikan Railway tunnel 62
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, still, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77124183007 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34443876045 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1897421755 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.846153846 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181255576646 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649866444506 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533202266753 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101249095321 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285147327678 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.