The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010
The bar chart compares the amount of oil produced by several Gulf countries on a daily basis from 1990 to 2010.
It is clear that while Saudi Arabia produced the highest amount of oil over 2 decades, Qatar’s oil capacity was the lowest.
In 1990, over 8 million of oil barrels were produced in Saudi Arabia as opposed to nearly 1 million of Qatar. In the following decades, Although oil production in Saudi Arabia saw a massive increase by about 6 million of barrels, that of Qatar remained constant at around 1 million.
The other four countries were all similar in terms of an upward trend. The production of oil in Iraq and Kuwait both stood at around 2 million of barrels in 1990 and doubled in 2010. The same goes for Iran and UAE which both peaked at approximately 4 million of barrels despite the stability in UAE’s oil capacity in 1990 and 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-05 | jadenguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | hnhung | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-25 | vivitoben | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical day in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 73
- The pie charts below show the proportion graduate with science degree and art degree in a company in 1990 and 2010 85
- Some groups of people have benefited from the modern communications technology but some people have not benefited at all Do you agree or disagree 89
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers influenced by advertisements. What can be done to protect them 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1990 to 2010. It is clear that while Saudi Arabia produced the highest amount...
^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...of barrels in 1990 and doubled in 2010. The same goes for Iran and UAE which both p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 720.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64516129032 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51227165031 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7637475491 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26430629534 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129927718674 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777275820062 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173085552762 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807291859957 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.