Some experts believe that is it better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
It is believed by some professionals that children should start studying a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. This policy has both positive and negative outcomes.
On the one hand, it is easier for young children to learn a new language than teenagers. At the early age, their brains are programmed to adopt new things while this may be more difficult for secondary school students when these students have thinking-paths in their minds. Moreover, primary students only have to study a few subjects compared to secondary students with a flexible timetable. That allows them to spend more time on language lessons which will help them gain their basic skills for their development in secondary and high schools.
On the other hand, as mentioned above, there are some disadvantages of this policy. Primary school teachers may not have necessary language knowledge, in other words their language ability cannot demand the level of skill required for the programs. Another negative thing to consider is that some children may find no interest in language learning in their primary years but are keen on another subjects. It could be, as a result, a waste of time if we force them to learn what their brains refuse to.
In conclusion, despite some negative sides discussed, the advantages are enough to be considered. I personally believe that early language education still need to be applied to young children as a necessary preparation for them for higher education level. I suggest that foreign language should be taught to children in extra courses in addition to their school study, since it will help them to gain enthusiasts and achieve some skills needed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Elmira Gh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | trucn | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Salemo | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Jesslynindah | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Asadbek2001 | 56 | view |
- Mobile phones have changed the way many people communicate Nowadays people cannot live without them if they want to be a part of society To what extent do you think this is true Why do you some people have not adapted to this type of communication Give re 65
- Many people hold a view that children should be taught to be part community by their parents, while others would argue that it is better for them to learn this at school. 78
- Line graph describing trend The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- These days Internet-based courses have become a popular alternative to university-based courses. Some students prefer this type of learning because they do not need to attend lectures. Others argue that it is important to study at university.Discuss both 56
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for example for sport or music, and others are not . However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sport person or musician.Discuss both these views 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11913357401 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64011245953 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545126353791 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9749526609 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37051950963 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136563368088 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118631823661 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263782199553 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112215923986 0.056905535591 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.