As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
The idea that, besides making money, companies also need to have social responsibilities remains a source of argument. In my opinion, I agree that enterprises should not do business just for profit, they must contribute to public.
On the one hand, the efforts of companies making profits as much as possible bring some benefits to the community. Firstly, enterprises need profit in order to not only pay their workers salary but also have money to reinvest in their production chain to maintain the businesses. As a result, they will create more job opportunities to the community. Secondly, the more money they could make, the more taxes they have to pay. Therefore, the government have more revenue to spend on public facilities such as schools and hospitals.
On the other hand, there are some reasons that businesses also have social responsibilities. The first reason is that their production and commercial activities impact on the environment. For example, without controls, production processes could lead to serious environmental issues such as global warming due to acid rain emissions from heavy industry or toxic waste is discharged directly into rivers. If factories install industrial waste treatment systems, pollution will be controlled. Another reason is that enterprises should help the less lucky people by putting back a part of their profit to the community through philanthropic activities such as providing scholarships or giving donations.
In conclusion, although, I agree that earning profits is one of the bases of enterprises, I would argue that all businesses should have social responsibilities.
- Brick manufacturing 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 78
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 78
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44881889764 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08962572031 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3190632602 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.461538462 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269123889325 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954532378484 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104321397003 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183750220727 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792141703591 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.