Nowadays information is freely available on the internet, therefore is no longer need for museum, to what extent do you agree or disagree?
At the present day, all humans have been possessed to access the internet for gathering data or acquiring a knowledge and exclude a museum as a base of reference. To stand that phenomenon, the writer may assume that human may lose in touch with in such actual phenomena, and they solely are triggered by a bias resources that are given by virtual worlds.
Prior to the internet technologies arrived at science commodities. Academicians preserved an archaeological artefact as a source of study. They connected the actual idea precisely from innate objects. As a result, a conclusion that was acquired by some researcher were without flawless, and the object impossible to imitate.
Reversely, studies' behaviour, today, does not contain those privilege of original observation. The data that are compelled in online resources tendentiously extracted from a content that does not belong to actual fact. For example, some studies want to know about mathematical science beneath the surface of Leonardo Davinci's paints. The immature researchers who want to do research in advance, and without any hard efforts, they tend to look on the website, while the online data may be suggested full of fake objects. In so forth, the result of observation may imply an error achievement.
In such of those facts, the writer may conclude that even though, the internet provides such a great accessible data of knowledge, those are not factual and tendentiously unoriginal. In another side, the museum gives us original resources despite that many efforts to achieve them.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 89
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports or musicians.Discuss both these views and g 78
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agre 53
- "Failure is proof that the desire wasn't strong enough."To what extent do you agree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'resource'?
Suggestion: resource
...and they solely are triggered by a bias resources that are given by virtual worlds. Prio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
... from a content that does not belong to actual fact. For example, some studies want to know...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t factual and tendentiously unoriginal. In another side, the museum gives us origi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, may, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.236 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90500533562 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8720886892 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.692307692 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0625393552613 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.020195145435 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268414681171 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0379937810165 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145585553062 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.